All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
To: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Slow startup of systemd-journal on BTRFS
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 21:42:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A09A30.2030800@libero.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADU+-uCQe+ThvH8EOW0tn+Oh4ZNnSP0P743mF7NXNDuD2yokCA@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/17/2014 08:46 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:13 PM, cwillu <cwillu@cwillu.com> wrote:
>> For the case of sequential writes (via write or mmap), padding writes
>> to page boundaries would help, if the wasted space isn't an issue.
>> Another approach, again assuming all other writes are appends, would
>> be to periodically (but frequently enough that the pages are still in
>> cache) read a chunk of the file and write it back in-place, with or
>> without an fsync. On the other hand, if you can afford to lose some
>> logs on a crash, not fsyncing/msyncing after each write will also
>> eliminate the fragmentation.
> 
> I was wondering if something could be done in btrfs to improve
> performance under this workload... Something like a "defrag on demand"
> for a case where mostly appends are happening.

Instead of inventing a strategy smarter than the (already smart) filesystem, would be more simple make an explicit defrag ?

In any case this "smart strategy" is filesystem specific, so it would be more simple (and less error prone) do an explicit defrag.

I tried this strategy with systemd-journald, getting good results (doing a ioctl BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG during the journal opening).

BR
G.Baroncelli

-- 
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D  17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-17 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-12 11:13 R: Re: Slow startup of systemd-journal on BTRFS Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
2014-06-12 12:37 ` Duncan
2014-06-12 23:24   ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-13 22:19     ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-06-14  2:53       ` Duncan
2014-06-14  7:52         ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-06-15  5:43           ` Duncan
2014-06-15 22:39             ` [systemd-devel] " Lennart Poettering
2014-06-15 22:13           ` Lennart Poettering
2014-06-16  0:17             ` Russell Coker
2014-06-16  1:06               ` John Williams
2014-06-16  2:19                 ` Russell Coker
2014-06-16 10:14               ` Lennart Poettering
2014-06-16 10:35                 ` Russell Coker
2014-06-16 11:16                   ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-06-16 11:56                 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2014-06-16 16:05                 ` Josef Bacik
2014-06-16 19:52                   ` Martin
2014-06-16 20:20                     ` Josef Bacik
2014-06-17  0:15                     ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-06-17  1:13                     ` cwillu
2014-06-17 12:24                       ` Martin
2014-06-17 17:56                       ` Chris Murphy
2014-06-17 18:46                       ` Filipe Brandenburger
2014-06-17 19:42                         ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
2014-06-17 21:12                   ` Lennart Poettering
2014-06-16 16:32             ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-06-16 18:47               ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-06-19  1:13             ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-14 10:59         ` Kai Krakow
2014-06-15  5:02           ` Duncan
2014-06-15 11:18             ` Kai Krakow
2014-06-15 21:45           ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-06-15 21:51             ` Hugo Mills
2014-06-15 22:43           ` [systemd-devel] " Lennart Poettering
2014-06-15 21:31         ` Martin Steigerwald
2014-06-15 21:37           ` Hugo Mills
2014-06-17  8:22           ` Duncan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-06-11 21:28 Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-06-12  1:21 ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-12  1:37   ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-12  2:32     ` Chris Murphy
2014-06-15 22:34       ` [systemd-devel] " Lennart Poettering
2014-06-16  4:01         ` Chris Murphy
2014-06-16  4:38           ` cwillu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53A09A30.2030800@libero.it \
    --to=kreijack@libero.it \
    --cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.