Re: [PATCHv4 4/4] ARM: dts: Fix wrong compatible string for Exynos3250 ADC

[Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>]

Hi Chanwoo,

On 18.06.2014 04:21, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patchset fix wrong compatible string for Exynos3250 ADC. Exynos3250 SoC
> need to control only special clock for ADC. Exynos SoC except for Exynos3250
> has not included special clock for ADC. The exynos ADC driver can control
> special clock if compatible string is 'exynos3250-adc-v2'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> index 6c1fb67..107dc44 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> @@ -414,10 +414,10 @@
>  		};
>  
>  		adc: adc@126C0000 {
> -			compatible = "samsung,exynos-adc-v3";
> +			compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-adc-v2";
>  			reg = <0x126C0000 0x100>, <0x10020718 0x4>;
>  			interrupts = <0 137 0>;
> -			clock-names = "adc", "sclk_tsadc";
> +			clock-names = "adc", "sclk_adc";

So, is it "sclk_adc" or "sclk_tsadc"? The code uses the former, while
the documentation mentions the latter. Please fix this.

Best regards,
Tomasz