From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm, thp: move invariant bug check out of loop in __split_huge_page_map
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 11:31:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A1B0B8.6070505@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140618122442.GB5957@node.dhcp.inet.fi>
On 06/18/2014 08:24 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 06:37:58PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> In the __split_huge_page_map() function, the check for
>> page_mapcount(page) is invariant within the for loop. Because of the
>> fact that the macro is implemented using atomic_read(), the redundant
>> check cannot be optimized away by the compiler leading to unnecessary
>> read to the page structure.
>>
>> This patch moves the invariant bug check out of the loop so that it
>> will be done only once. On a 3.16-rc1 based kernel, the execution
>> time of a microbenchmark that broke up 1000 transparent huge pages
>> using munmap() had an execution time of 38,245us and 38,548us with
>> and without the patch respectively. The performance gain is about 1%.
> For this low difference it would be nice to average over few runs +
> stddev. It can easily can be a noise.
The timing data was the average of 5 runs with a SD of 100-200us.
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long<Waiman.Long@hp.com>
> But okay:
>
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
>
Thank for the review.
-Longman
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm, thp: move invariant bug check out of loop in __split_huge_page_map
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 11:31:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A1B0B8.6070505@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140618122442.GB5957@node.dhcp.inet.fi>
On 06/18/2014 08:24 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 06:37:58PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> In the __split_huge_page_map() function, the check for
>> page_mapcount(page) is invariant within the for loop. Because of the
>> fact that the macro is implemented using atomic_read(), the redundant
>> check cannot be optimized away by the compiler leading to unnecessary
>> read to the page structure.
>>
>> This patch moves the invariant bug check out of the loop so that it
>> will be done only once. On a 3.16-rc1 based kernel, the execution
>> time of a microbenchmark that broke up 1000 transparent huge pages
>> using munmap() had an execution time of 38,245us and 38,548us with
>> and without the patch respectively. The performance gain is about 1%.
> For this low difference it would be nice to average over few runs +
> stddev. It can easily can be a noise.
The timing data was the average of 5 runs with a SD of 100-200us.
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long<Waiman.Long@hp.com>
> But okay:
>
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
>
Thank for the review.
-Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-18 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-17 22:37 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm, thp: two THP splitting performance fixes Waiman Long
2014-06-17 22:37 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17 22:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm, thp: move invariant bug check out of loop in __split_huge_page_map Waiman Long
2014-06-17 22:37 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 12:24 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-06-18 12:24 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-06-18 15:31 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2014-06-18 15:31 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17 22:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm, thp: replace smp_mb after atomic_add by smp_mb__after_atomic Waiman Long
2014-06-17 22:37 ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 12:17 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-06-18 12:17 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A1B0B8.6070505@hp.com \
--to=waiman.long@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.