From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: correct mwait and monitor emulation Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:44:34 +0200 Message-ID: <53A1C1F2.4010909@redhat.com> References: <1403101176-23664-1-git-send-email-namit@cs.technion.ac.il> <1403101176-23664-4-git-send-email-namit@cs.technion.ac.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gleb@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org To: Bandan Das , Nadav Amit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4681 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753582AbaFRQot (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 12:44:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Il 18/06/2014 18:43, Bandan Das ha scritto: >> > mwait and monitor are currently handled as nop. Considering this behavior, they >> > should still be handled correctly, i.e., check execution conditions and generate >> > exceptions when required. mwait and monitor may also be executed in real-mode > Is this necessary ? They are NOPs and kvm prints that out (correctly so) to dmesg. > Implementing them correctly is a different thing, but adding extra checks for NOPs > just seems like adding extra cycles. Raising the correct exception is a good thing, though. The guest is going to busy wait anyway, it doesn't matter how fast it does that. :) Paolo