From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Riley <davidriley@chromium.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource: exynos-mct: Register the timer for stable udelay
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:11:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A2A936.3070109@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403167145-5267-1-git-send-email-amit.daniel@samsung.com>
On 06/19/2014 10:39 AM, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This patch register the exynos mct clocksource as the current timer
> as it has constant clock rate. This will generate correct udelay for the
> exynos platform and avoid using unnecessary calibrated jiffies. This change
> has been tested on exynos5420 based board and udelay is very close to
> expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
> ---
> Changes in V2:
> * Added #defines for ARM and ARM64 as pointed by Doug Anderson.
>
> Patches from David Riley confirmed that udelay is broken in exynos5420.
> Link to those patches are,
> 1) https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4344911/
> 2) https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4344881/
>
> drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> index f71d55f..02927e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> @@ -195,10 +195,25 @@ static u64 notrace exynos4_read_sched_clock(void)
> return exynos4_frc_read(&mct_frc);
> }
>
> +static struct delay_timer exynos4_delay_timer;
> +
> +static unsigned long exynos4_read_current_timer(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef ARM
> + return __raw_readl(reg_base + EXYNOS4_MCT_G_CNT_L);
> +#else /* ARM64, etc */
> + return exynos4_frc_read(&mct_frc);
> +#endif
> +}
> +
There isn't another solution than that ? macros definitions in C file
are avoided as much as possible.
> static void __init exynos4_clocksource_init(void)
> {
> exynos4_mct_frc_start();
>
> + exynos4_delay_timer.read_current_timer = &exynos4_read_current_timer;
&exynos4_read_current_timer ?
> + exynos4_delay_timer.freq = clk_rate;
> + register_current_timer_delay(&exynos4_delay_timer);
> +
> if (clocksource_register_hz(&mct_frc, clk_rate))
> panic("%s: can't register clocksource\n", mct_frc.name);
>
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] clocksource: exynos-mct: Register the timer for stable udelay
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:11:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A2A936.3070109@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403167145-5267-1-git-send-email-amit.daniel@samsung.com>
On 06/19/2014 10:39 AM, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> This patch register the exynos mct clocksource as the current timer
> as it has constant clock rate. This will generate correct udelay for the
> exynos platform and avoid using unnecessary calibrated jiffies. This change
> has been tested on exynos5420 based board and udelay is very close to
> expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
> ---
> Changes in V2:
> * Added #defines for ARM and ARM64 as pointed by Doug Anderson.
>
> Patches from David Riley confirmed that udelay is broken in exynos5420.
> Link to those patches are,
> 1) https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4344911/
> 2) https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4344881/
>
> drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> index f71d55f..02927e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> @@ -195,10 +195,25 @@ static u64 notrace exynos4_read_sched_clock(void)
> return exynos4_frc_read(&mct_frc);
> }
>
> +static struct delay_timer exynos4_delay_timer;
> +
> +static unsigned long exynos4_read_current_timer(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef ARM
> + return __raw_readl(reg_base + EXYNOS4_MCT_G_CNT_L);
> +#else /* ARM64, etc */
> + return exynos4_frc_read(&mct_frc);
> +#endif
> +}
> +
There isn't another solution than that ? macros definitions in C file
are avoided as much as possible.
> static void __init exynos4_clocksource_init(void)
> {
> exynos4_mct_frc_start();
>
> + exynos4_delay_timer.read_current_timer = &exynos4_read_current_timer;
&exynos4_read_current_timer ?
> + exynos4_delay_timer.freq = clk_rate;
> + register_current_timer_delay(&exynos4_delay_timer);
> +
> if (clocksource_register_hz(&mct_frc, clk_rate))
> panic("%s: can't register clocksource\n", mct_frc.name);
>
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-19 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-19 8:39 [PATCH v2] clocksource: exynos-mct: Register the timer for stable udelay Amit Daniel Kachhap
2014-06-19 8:39 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2014-06-19 9:11 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2014-06-19 9:11 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-06-19 10:21 ` amit daniel kachhap
2014-06-19 10:21 ` amit daniel kachhap
2014-06-19 10:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-19 10:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-19 10:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-06-19 10:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-06-19 11:00 ` amit daniel kachhap
2014-06-19 11:00 ` amit daniel kachhap
2014-06-19 10:21 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-19 10:21 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-19 16:01 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-19 16:01 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-19 16:17 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-19 16:17 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-19 16:31 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-19 16:31 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-19 16:40 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-19 16:40 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-20 8:15 ` Will Deacon
2014-06-20 8:15 ` Will Deacon
2014-06-20 11:19 ` amit daniel kachhap
2014-06-20 11:19 ` amit daniel kachhap
2014-06-20 17:47 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-20 17:47 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-21 9:53 ` amit daniel kachhap
2014-06-21 9:53 ` amit daniel kachhap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A2A936.3070109@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=amit.daniel@samsung.com \
--cc=davidriley@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.