From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1Wz2m4-0000AX-RB for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 07:51:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59667) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wz2lw-0008PI-P1 for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 07:50:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wz2lq-0006Ay-He for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 07:50:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wz2lc-00068I-JA; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 07:50:32 -0400 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s5NBoVg9018832 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 23 Jun 2014 07:50:31 -0400 Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-112-50.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.50]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s5NBoS7h030783; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 07:50:29 -0400 Message-ID: <53A81484.7020708@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:50:28 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <1402063613-12400-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1402063613-12400-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <539461DE.5050700@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <53A5A0D5.9020904@msgid.tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: <53A5A0D5.9020904@msgid.tls.msk.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.26 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] x86: correctly implement soft reset X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:50:59 -0000 Il 21/06/2014 17:12, Michael Tokarev ha scritto: >>> >> Do not do a hard reset for port 92h, keyboard controller, or cf9h soft reset. >>> >> These only reset the CPU. >> > >> > I'm not sure how this is -trivial material? :) > Ping? > This patch hasn't been applied so far, do you want to actually push it? No, I submitted this by mistake. This version of the patch had review comments that I haven't had time to address yet. Paolo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59623) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wz2lk-00089i-C4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 07:50:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wz2ld-00068Y-F7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 07:50:40 -0400 Message-ID: <53A81484.7020708@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:50:28 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1402063613-12400-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1402063613-12400-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <539461DE.5050700@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <53A5A0D5.9020904@msgid.tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: <53A5A0D5.9020904@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] x86: correctly implement soft reset List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org Il 21/06/2014 17:12, Michael Tokarev ha scritto: >>> >> Do not do a hard reset for port 92h, keyboard controller, or cf9h soft reset. >>> >> These only reset the CPU. >> > >> > I'm not sure how this is -trivial material? :) > Ping? > This patch hasn't been applied so far, do you want to actually push it? No, I submitted this by mistake. This version of the patch had review comments that I haven't had time to address yet. Paolo