From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] mx6: add support of multi-processor command
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:50:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A97417.6080605@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403456208-5715-1-git-send-email-contact@huau-gabriel.fr>
Hi Gabriel,
On 22/06/2014 18:56, Gabriel Huau wrote:
> This allows u-boot to load different OS or Bare Metal application on the
> different cores of the i.MX6DQ.
> For example: we can run Android on cpu0 and a RT OS like QNX/FreeRTOS on cpu1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Huau <contact@huau-gabriel.fr>
> ---
> Changes for v2:
> - Add a commit log message to explain the purpose of this patch
> Changes for v3:
> - Remove unnecessary check for unsigned values when they are negative
>
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/mp.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h | 13 +++
> 3 files changed, 145 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/mp.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Makefile b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Makefile
> index d7285fc..ec08526 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Makefile
> @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
>
> obj-y := soc.o clock.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT) += hab.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MP) += mp.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/mp.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/mp.c
Do you have a user of this code ? I do not see it at the mopment.
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8105fcc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/mp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
> +/*
> + * (C) Copyright 2014
> + * Gabriel Huau <contact@huau-gabriel.fr>
> + *
> + * (C) Copyright 2009 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> + */
> +
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <asm/io.h>
> +#include <asm/errno.h>
> +#include <asm/arch/imx-regs.h>
> +
> +int cpu_reset(int nr)
> +{
As cpu__ are quite too generic and could conflict, I suggest to use more
specific names indicating that you are enabling/disabling a core on the
cpu. Something like imx_core_reset() or whatever you choose.
> + uint32_t reg;
> + struct src *src = (struct src *)SRC_BASE_ADDR;
> +
> + reg = __raw_readl(&src->scr);
> +
> + switch (nr) {
> + case 1:
> + reg |= SRC_SCR_CORE_1_RESET_MASK;
> + break;
> +
> + case 2:
> + reg |= SRC_SCR_CORE_2_RESET_MASK;
> + break;
> +
> + case 3:
> + reg |= SRC_SCR_CORE_3_RESET_MASK;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* Software reset of the CPU N */
> + __raw_writel(reg, &src->scr);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int cpu_status(int nr)
> +{
> + uint32_t reg;
> + struct src *src = (struct src *)SRC_BASE_ADDR;
> +
> + reg = __raw_readl(&src->scr);
> +
> + switch (nr) {
> + case 1:
> + printf("core 1: %d\n", !!(reg & SRC_SCR_CORE_1_ENABLE_MASK));
> + break;
> +
> + case 2:
> + printf("core 2: %d\n", !!(reg & SRC_SCR_CORE_2_ENABLE_MASK));
> + break;
> +
> + case 3:
> + printf("core 3: %d\n", !!(reg & SRC_SCR_CORE_3_ENABLE_MASK));
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int cpu_release(int nr, int argc, char *const argv[])
> +{
> + uint32_t reg;
> + struct src *src = (struct src *)SRC_BASE_ADDR;
> + uint32_t boot_addr;
> +
> + boot_addr = simple_strtoul(argv[0], NULL, 16);
> + reg = __raw_readl(&src->scr);
> +
> + switch (nr) {
> + case 1:
> + __raw_writel(boot_addr, &src->gpr3);
> + reg |= SRC_SCR_CORE_1_ENABLE_MASK;
> + break;
> +
> + case 2:
> + __raw_writel(boot_addr, &src->gpr5);
> + reg |= SRC_SCR_CORE_2_ENABLE_MASK;
> + break;
> +
> + case 3:
> + __raw_writel(boot_addr, &src->gpr7);
> + reg |= SRC_SCR_CORE_3_ENABLE_MASK;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* CPU N is ready to start */
> + __raw_writel(reg, &src->scr);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int is_core_valid(unsigned int nr)
> +{
> + if (nr >= CONFIG_NUM_CPUS)
And where is defined CONFIG_NUM_CPUS ?
Why do we have to configure it ? The number is related to the running
SOC and cannot be changed.
> + return 0;
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +int cpu_disable(int nr)
> +{
> + uint32_t reg;
> + struct src *src = (struct src *)SRC_BASE_ADDR;
> +
> + reg = __raw_readl(&src->scr);
> +
> + switch (nr) {
> + case 1:
> + reg &= ~SRC_SCR_CORE_1_ENABLE_MASK;
> + break;
> +
> + case 2:
> + reg &= ~SRC_SCR_CORE_2_ENABLE_MASK;
> + break;
> +
> + case 3:
> + reg &= ~SRC_SCR_CORE_3_ENABLE_MASK;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* Disable the CPU N */
> + __raw_writel(reg, &src->scr);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h
> index 1f19727..3f8c2ee 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h
> @@ -225,6 +225,19 @@
>
> extern void imx_get_mac_from_fuse(int dev_id, unsigned char *mac);
>
> +#define SRC_SCR_CORE_1_RESET_OFFSET 14
> +#define SRC_SCR_CORE_1_RESET_MASK (1<<SRC_SCR_CORE_1_RESET_OFFSET)
> +#define SRC_SCR_CORE_2_RESET_OFFSET 15
> +#define SRC_SCR_CORE_2_RESET_MASK (1<<SRC_SCR_CORE_2_RESET_OFFSET)
> +#define SRC_SCR_CORE_3_RESET_OFFSET 16
> +#define SRC_SCR_CORE_3_RESET_MASK (1<<SRC_SCR_CORE_3_RESET_OFFSET)
> +#define SRC_SCR_CORE_1_ENABLE_OFFSET 22
> +#define SRC_SCR_CORE_1_ENABLE_MASK (1<<SRC_SCR_CORE_1_ENABLE_OFFSET)
> +#define SRC_SCR_CORE_2_ENABLE_OFFSET 23
> +#define SRC_SCR_CORE_2_ENABLE_MASK (1<<SRC_SCR_CORE_2_ENABLE_OFFSET)
> +#define SRC_SCR_CORE_3_ENABLE_OFFSET 24
> +#define SRC_SCR_CORE_3_ENABLE_MASK (1<<SRC_SCR_CORE_3_ENABLE_OFFSET)
> +
> /* System Reset Controller (SRC) */
> struct src {
> u32 scr;
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic at denx.de
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-24 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-21 18:29 [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6: add support of multi-processor command Gabriel Huau
2014-06-21 21:36 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-06-21 23:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] " Gabriel Huau
2014-06-22 9:14 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2014-06-22 16:56 ` gabriel huau
2014-06-22 16:56 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] " Gabriel Huau
2014-06-24 12:50 ` Stefano Babic [this message]
2014-06-25 0:22 ` gabriel huau
2014-06-25 2:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] " Gabriel Huau
2014-07-08 9:18 ` Stefano Babic
2014-07-12 22:31 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] " Gabriel Huau
2014-07-13 9:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-07-13 23:16 ` gabriel huau
2014-07-15 7:49 ` Stefano Babic
2014-07-15 14:13 ` gabriel huau
2014-07-15 19:35 ` Stefano Babic
2014-07-15 19:59 ` Gabriel Huau
2014-07-26 18:35 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v6] " Gabriel Huau
2014-07-28 15:15 ` Stefano Babic
2014-09-03 18:00 ` York Sun
2014-09-03 18:26 ` Gabriel Huau
2014-09-03 18:36 ` York Sun
2014-09-03 18:45 ` Gabriel Huau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A97417.6080605@denx.de \
--to=sbabic@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.