From: Marco Tessore <marco.tessore@axelsw.it>
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>,
xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Kernel freezes in __ipipe_sync_stage
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:41:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A9AA38.3090005@axelsw.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53A4207F.9040801@xenomai.org>
Hi,
Il 20/06/2014 13:52, Gilles Chanteperdrix ha scritto:
> On 06/20/2014 11:11 AM, Marco Tessore wrote:
>> The kernel is version 2.6.31 for ARM architecture - specifically a
> Do you have the same problem with a recent I-pipe patches, like one for
> 3.8 or 3.10 kernel?
>
I managed to do some tests on 3.10 kernel but on onother board with
imx28 CPU, actually it happens that that kernel freezes too,
but I haven't debugged it with the jtag debugger.
I have, instead, some information on the original problem, that is the
one that worried me more:
In summary:
I have a board based on imx25, with kernel 2.6.31, Xenomai 2.5.6 and
ipipe patch 1.16-02.
Rarely, but often enough to be a problem, the kernel freezes at boot.
Thanks to a JTAG debugger I'm able to observe the kernel in the
following situation:
I'm in an infinite loop with the following stack trace:
__ipipe_set_irqpending
xnintr_host_tick (__ipipe_propagate_irq)
xnintr_clock_handler
__ipipe_sync_stage <- (1)
ipipe_suspend_domain
__ipipe_walk_pipeline
__ipipe_restore_pipeline_head
xnarch_next_tick_shot
clockevents_program_event
tick_dev_program_event
hrtimer_interrupt
mxc_interrupt
handle_IRQ_event
handle_level_irq
asm_do_IRQ
__ipipe_sync_stage <- (2)
ipipe_suspend_domain
__ipipe_walk_pipeline
__ipipe_restore_pipeline_head
xnpod_enable_timesource
xnpod_init
__native_skin_init
...
...
Specifically, it happens that the first call to __ipipe_sync_stage, the
one marked with the number (2), is working on a stage that I can not
determine,
let's say for convenience stage S1, I think is the Linux secondary
domain but I'm not sure,
so the function invokes the interrupt handler of the system timer.
Continuing in the stack trace, I have a nested call to
__ipipe_sync_stage, indicated with (1),
but this call works on another stage, for convenience domain S2,
in turn this function invokes a handler for the timer irq, which at a
certain point invokes the __ipipe_propagate_irq which raises the flags
for the stage S1,
thus making the first call to __ipipe_sync_stage (2) fails to get out of
their while loops.
I should add that I do not see hardware interrupt for the timer in
function __ipipe_grab_IRQ.
I have no idea how the cycle is triggered,but when the kernel is locked,
the kernel is located in the software exclusively infinite loop
described above.
In the hope that you could help me understand what is going on,
I would have liked groped a patch like this:
- Store, for each level of nesting of __ipipe_sync_stage, the irq number
currently running and on behalf of which stage.
- Patch the function __ipipe_set_irqpending in such a way as not to set
the flags for the pair (irq, stage) if the pair is already present at
some level in the current stack trace, that is,
- if the function __ipipe_sync_stage is executing the handler for a
stage, and then he had reset the flags in irqpend_himask and
irqpend_lomask, it does not expect the handler goes to raise again the
same flag for the same stage.
What do you think about this?
Thank you very much for any kind of advice you could give me
Sincerely
Marco Tessore
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-24 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-20 9:11 [Xenomai] Kernel freezes in __ipipe_sync_stage Marco Tessore
2014-06-20 11:52 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2014-06-20 12:18 ` Marco Tessore
2014-06-20 12:25 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2014-06-24 16:41 ` Marco Tessore [this message]
2014-06-24 17:10 ` Philippe Gerum
2014-06-25 7:50 ` Marco Tessore
2014-06-25 8:39 ` Philippe Gerum
2014-07-02 16:36 ` Marco Tessore
2014-07-02 17:41 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2014-07-09 16:09 ` Marco Tessore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A9AA38.3090005@axelsw.it \
--to=marco.tessore@axelsw.it \
--cc=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.