From: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] cfg80211: expose cfg80211_disable_40mhz_24ghz module parameter
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:50:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53AAFDF3.9030707@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403711846.4140.16.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
On 25-06-14 17:57, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 19:21 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>
>>>> + * @wiphy: The wiphy to check.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Return: true is 40MHz is disabled in 2.4G band.
>>>> + */
>>>> +bool wiphy_is_40mhz_24ghz_disabled(struct wiphy *wiphy);
>>>
>>> Why should that have a wiphy argument?
>>
>> It is up to cfg80211 to determine the logic behind the function. It is
>> just context supplied by the caller. The fact that it is determined by a
>> module parameter is internal cfg80211 stuff.
>
> I just don't really see any way it would ever be per wiphy?
Maybe you are right. By the way, is OBSS support a requirement to do
40MHz in 2.4G?
>>> Might also be simpler to just export the variable?
>>
>> Either way is pretty simple I guess.
>
> Yeah, dunno. I guess exporting the function at least makes sure nobody
> will try to set the variable, so that's somewhat useful...
>
> I'd prefer to remove the wiphy argument though (and fix the kernel-doc)
No problem. Will do.
Gr. AvS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-25 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-17 9:16 [RFC 0/3] brcmfmac: provide band info upon wiphy registration Arend van Spriel
2014-06-17 9:16 ` [RFC 1/3] brcmfmac: move attach and detach functions in wl_cfg80211.c Arend van Spriel
2014-06-17 9:16 ` [RFC 2/3] cfg80211: expose cfg80211_disable_40mhz_24ghz module parameter Arend van Spriel
2014-06-23 9:34 ` Johannes Berg
2014-06-24 17:21 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-06-25 15:57 ` Johannes Berg
2014-06-25 16:50 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2014-06-17 9:16 ` [RFC 3/3] brcmfmac: update band and regulatory info before wiphy_register() Arend van Spriel
2014-06-23 9:37 ` Johannes Berg
2014-06-24 17:11 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-06-25 15:55 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53AAFDF3.9030707@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.