From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] xen: arm: allocate more than one bank for 1:1 domain 0 if needed Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:04:09 +0100 Message-ID: <53AD6BC9.5030602@linaro.org> References: <1403777793.16595.21.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <1403777837-16779-8-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <53AC6480.6080306@linaro.org> <1403861047.32314.15.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <53AD6924.7070102@linaro.org> <1403874060.3169.28.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1403874060.3169.28.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 27/06/14 14:01, Ian Campbell wrote: >> Futhermore, it looks like we always allocate memory from the top of this >> zone. Is it normal? > > Normal behaviour is to allocate from as high as possible so I'm not > surprised that applies with a zone as well. For DOM0 bank allocation, shouldn't we try to allocate as lower as possible? If not, we may not be able to create a second bank for dom0. -- Julien Grall