From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: Recommended teuthology upgrade test Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:23:57 +0200 Message-ID: <53ADA8AD.7030507@dachary.org> References: <53AD8AD9.8030809@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9SqsEAmKTXEw1idAiViomGrp7Ml5LS8JV" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:58800 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751377AbaF0RYF (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:24:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yuri Weinstein Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --9SqsEAmKTXEw1idAiViomGrp7Ml5LS8JV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 27/06/2014 18:17, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Loic >=20 > I don't intent to answer all questions, but some info, see inline >=20 > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:= >> Hi Sam, >> >> TL;DR: what oneliner do you recommend to run upgrade tests for https:/= /github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1890 ? >> >> Running the rados suite can be done with : >> >> ./schedule_suite.sh rados wip-8071 testing loic@dachary.org basic m= aster plana >> >=20 > It was replaced with teuthology-suite, see --help for more info >=20 >> or something else since ./schedule_suite.sh was recently obsoleted ( h= ttp://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8678 ). Running something similar for upgra= de will presumably run all of https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/= master/suites/upgrade >> >> Is there a way to run minimal tests by limiting the upgrade suite so t= hat it only focuses on a firefly cluster that upgrades to https://github.= com/ceph/ceph/pull/1890 so that it checks the behavior when running a mix= ed cluster (firefly + master with the change) ? >=20 > You can run specifying argument with smaller suite, like this: > dumpling-x/parallel Hi Yuri, Thanks for the hint :-) It is documented https://github.com/ceph/teutholo= gy/commit/7d2388b42c75f4526bc34c6a4b1b16637d967527 but it looks like it s= hould be more generic because any level of subdirectories can be used. Cheers >=20 >> >> It looks like http://pulpito.ceph.com/?suite=3Dupgrade was never run (= at least that's what appears to cause http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/868= 1 ) Is http://pulpito.ceph.com/?suite=3Dupgrade-rados a good fit ? If so = is there a way to figure out how it was created ? >> >> Cheers >> >> -- >> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --9SqsEAmKTXEw1idAiViomGrp7Ml5LS8JV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOtqK0ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23/BgCfaefyw0uqXSG20L9aVhuQNa3W Ar4An3JZYcnZIk8vtK2rjNYAki5rdHFW =TSqJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9SqsEAmKTXEw1idAiViomGrp7Ml5LS8JV--