From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32884)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <pl@kamp.de>)
	id 1X1WNW-0006Rt-50
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 03:52:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pl@kamp.de>) id 1X1WNN-0001pR-4P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 03:51:54 -0400
Received: from mx-v6.kamp.de ([2a02:248:0:51::16]:52903 helo=mx01.kamp.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <pl@kamp.de>)
	id 1X1WNM-0001oi-Oo
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 03:51:45 -0400
Message-ID: <53B1170C.5060609@kamp.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:51:40 +0200
From: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <53B003B2.2020309@kamp.de>	
	<1404113633.17465.3.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org>	
	<53B115A0.9040602@kamp.de>
	<1404114408.24066.0.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1404114408.24066.0.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] possible denial of service via VNC
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 30.06.2014 09:46, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>    Hi,
>
>> I would vote for disconnect as soon as the limit specified is too big. Otherwise
>> we had to rewrite the whole receive logic which could introduce additional
>> bugs.
> Sounds sensible.

Especially since client_cut_text is currently a NOP.

Peter