From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier MATZ Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/test: Removed vdev test in EAL flags unit test Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:20:48 +0200 Message-ID: <53B27D70.4090102@6wind.com> References: <1404139377-24580-1-git-send-email-pablox.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> <53B271E1.1010304@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" Hi Pablo, On 07/01/2014 10:59 AM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote: > I checked your patch, and I got this: > > ... > > EAL: Detected lcore 38 as core 11 on socket 1 > EAL: Detected lcore 39 as core 12 on socket 1 > EAL: Support maximum 64 logical core(s) by configuration. > EAL: Detected 40 lcore(s) > ./x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/test: unrecognized option '--prefix=whitelist' I'm sorry, I cleaned the patch without retesting it, and I introduced a bug in it (--prefix instead of --file-prefix). Please find the new one as a reply to this mail. When I test it, I get: [...] EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x200000 bytes EAL: Virtual area found at 0x2aaba4c00000 (size = 0x200000) EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x200000 bytes EAL: Virtual area found at 0x2aaba4e00000 (size = 0x200000) EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x200000 bytes EAL: Virtual area found at 0x2aaba5000000 (size = 0x200000) EAL: Requesting 984 pages of size 2MB from socket 0 EAL: Requesting 1000 pages of size 2MB from socket 1 EAL: TSC frequency is ~3333293 KHz EAL: Master core 0 is ready (tid=ab9044e0) PMD: Initializing pmd_ring for eth_ring PMD: Error parsing device, invalid key PMD: Ignoring unsupported parameters when creating rings-backed ethernet device PMD: Creating rings-backed ethdev on numa socket 0 > Also, I thought we could not run two primary process at the same time > (considering that the test app is a primary process). Some other tests in the same file launch a primary process, I suppose it should work if the prefix for huge-pages is different. Regards, Olivier