From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: state model diagram Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 19:30:10 +0200 Message-ID: <53B2F022.1060002@dachary.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hEgKxurAn4Q1hUL4aQRrvjVLpHI3wI2tx" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:34140 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755193AbaGARaQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2014 13:30:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Koleos Fuscus Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --hEgKxurAn4Q1hUL4aQRrvjVLpHI3wI2tx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi koleofuscus, I took a look at https://wiki.ceph.com/Development/Add_erasure_coding_to_= the_durability_model/Technical_details_on_the_model and it makes sense to= me. However I wonder why you would want to go into that level of detail = ? Could you point me where you would encode such details events in the cu= rrent code ? Cheers On 26/06/2014 02:29, Koleos Fuscus wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I found a state model diagram in the page that explains peering > (http://ceph.com/docs/firefly/dev/peering/). The image cannot be > visualised correctly. I build the docs and could open the image in an > appropriate size using graphviz but still the layout is too complex > and messy. > I decided to do my own state model to collaborate in the understanding > of ceph. Actually, it helps me to measure my own understanding of the > system. Using the diagram facilitates the decision of modeling one > event or skip another. You can find the diagram here: > https://wiki.ceph.com/Development/Add_erasure_coding_to_the_durability_= model/Technical_details_on_the_model >=20 > Please give me your comments. >=20 > koleosfuscus >=20 > ________________________________________________________________ > "My reply is: the software has no known bugs, therefore it has not > been updated." > Wietse Venema >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --hEgKxurAn4Q1hUL4aQRrvjVLpHI3wI2tx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOy8CIACgkQ8dLMyEl6F21eDgCdEUTlnx9bhA5qfShczSvsKusY lTwAnRIVGSAlZrFO5Hn8wTuf6SJtjqP/ =/CSd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hEgKxurAn4Q1hUL4aQRrvjVLpHI3wI2tx--