From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 7AF97E003C1; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 17:28:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.192.177 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com (mail-pd0-f177.google.com [209.85.192.177]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABA4E00289 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 17:27:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id y10so10818805pdj.8 for ; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 17:27:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type; bh=5qji1Hi8nDRruoKJg5ONHHVBZyg1WapiCTND6ot0hmw=; b=LXsyyc8pNwGdsmIFF20GDvpqQN1C5IO8o963baJRgEK0MEucXIo6rMc1W21sspPBf0 R5UJhCMr/HKtu2jA34h9+Pjx5AVtP2V40HJs6Gd+t9FNR1dbl05PGQXIuAPay5JeuFuq yJiu3oIjEb3q2SSUwIpdwXrWt30w0K29SG8aULxNbH+ab0NAg3M0TzkXUqdTvTp6OhxR iBODlFgAk9XjkGU5I+EZambimGTE55ssQDvlkC/zW6xS8/8ehNkncC2KO6wFhiNd7F4r Urf3VK26L1zxNE//FzrWAFv4SnJM8djwZVc12LcLVPCYB6DryUYQn4dTnSz51iBkEkM/ jM1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm72uAtpvaTcs5nhALU4mP26iOpA8ojyC2xj47YjcC671Ikx8tL9I00Bz60H8DzweovPlHi X-Received: by 10.68.200.10 with SMTP id jo10mr65756111pbc.143.1404260872669; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 17:27:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.7.100.231] (64.2.3.195.ptr.us.xo.net. [64.2.3.195]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pu5sm34461666pbb.4.2014.07.01.17.27.51 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Jul 2014 17:27:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53B35206.7090800@mvista.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 17:27:50 -0700 From: akuster User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: regarding : [PATCH] libcap-ng: resolved issue related with LONG_BIT definition. X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:28:06 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070503010609010908080902" --------------070503010609010908080902 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit There was a patch posted on April 7th ( sorry don't have original email) From: "Alexandru.Vaduva" > The problem is well known for 64 bits architectures and the solution is offered in the same recibe but in the meta-selinux layer. Signed-off-by: Alexandru.Vaduva > --- recipes-security/libcap-ng/libcap-ng/python.patch | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++ recipes-security/libcap-ng/libcap-ng_0.7.3.bb | 38 ++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) create mode 100644 recipes-security/libcap-ng/libcap-ng/python.patch I am seeing a build issue with meta-security that this patch fixes. was it Nack'd? regards, Armin --------------070503010609010908080902 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit There was a patch posted on April 7th ( sorry don't have original email)
From: "Alexandru.Vaduva" <Alexandru.Vaduva at enea.com>

The problem is well known for 64 bits architectures and the solution
is offered in the same recibe but in the meta-selinux layer.

Signed-off-by: Alexandru.Vaduva <Alexandru.Vaduva at enea.com>
---
 recipes-security/libcap-ng/libcap-ng/python.patch |   39 +++++++++++++++++++++
 recipes-security/libcap-ng/libcap-ng_0.7.3.bb     |   38 ++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 recipes-security/libcap-ng/libcap-ng/python.patch
I am seeing a build issue with meta-security that this patch fixes.

was it Nack'd?

regards,
Armin --------------070503010609010908080902--