From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id CE650E0054C; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 06:01:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954CDE003D2 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 06:01:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (c-68-38-40-177.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [68.38.40.177]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392C8228805B for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53B40293.603@mindchasers.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:01:07 -0400 From: Bob Cochran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: FSL Community BSP Meeting - 07/03/2014 - 18:00 GMT X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:01:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/27/2014 09:55 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > meta-fsl-ppc > * Release Notes > * Technical implications Hello FSL BSL Community. This is the first of 2 emails that I am forwarding from earlier discussions regarding meta-fsl-ppc. I have periodically used the meta-freescale board to raise issues that I see about the disconnect between FSL's use of the Yocto Project repo, their public GIT, and the SDK releases and a general lack of transparency regarding their BSP / SDK development and bug resolution process. I hope these issues can be followed and worked in upcoming BSP meetings. Bob -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Re:[mcswdev] [yocto] Yocto branches policy for concurrent SDK releases Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:39:07 +0000 From: zhenhua.luo@freescale.com To: Bob Cochran CC: yocto@yoctoproject.org Hi Bob, Sorry for the late response. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Cochran [mailto:yocto@mindchasers.com] > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 4:25 AM > > Any plans to create a repo for meta-fsl-networking on git.yoctoproject > for Power / QorIQ developers? [Luo Zhenhua-B19537] meta-fsl-networking layer manages the packages maintained internally, so the layer can't be upstreamed. > It would be good for yocto users, such as myself, to be able to build > something incremental between the SDK releases using updated / patched > recipes pulled from the yocto repos, which should include meta-fsl- > networking. > > Say I wanted to propose a patch to a recipe like fsl-image-full, which is > in meta-fsl-networking, how would I go about it? [Luo Zhenhua-B19537] For such case, we will consider to move the demo image recipes into meta-fsl-ppc layer. > Last February (2013), you proposed an FSL Yocto layers reorg that merged > layerscape/ARM with Power for QorIQ. I imagine you're getting close to > having something internally. Can you please share the vision with us > along with whether it will be public on the yocto project (as opposed to > kept under wraps with incremental SDK releases)? [Luo Zhenhua-B19537] Currently we are working on it, and will publish the staffs publicly when it is ready. Best Regards, Zhenhua