From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] xen/atomic: Introduce common atomic header and update includes Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 15:07:36 +0100 Message-ID: <53B41228.6030407@citrix.com> References: <1404308871-23368-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <1404308871-23368-2-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <53B42CC1020000780001F96D@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <53B42CC1020000780001F96D@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Keir Fraser , Tim Deegan , Stefano Stabellini , Ian Campbell , Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/07/14 15:01, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 02.07.14 at 15:47, wrote: >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/apic.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/apic.c >> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ >> #include >> #include >> #include >> -#include >> +#include > I appreciate you having taken the time to replace all these, but - do > we really need to do this replacement at this point? Especially arch > code should be fine using the asm/ header instad of the xen/ one. > > Jan > Not strictly, but I figured it was cleaner to update everything at once than to have a mix of common and arch specific includes. (Also it didn't take long at all. `git grep ... | xargs sed` is a remakably quick refactoring tool, and gcc will quickly tell you if it went wrong) ~Andrew