From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.coquelin@st.com (Maxime Coquelin) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 10:06:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add reset controllers for STiH407 SoC In-Reply-To: <20140702165924.GB17665@lee--X1> References: <1404310129-14667-1-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <1404317194.4109.13.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de> <20140702165924.GB17665@lee--X1> Message-ID: <53B50EFD.2070007@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/02/2014 06:59 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote: > >> Hi Peter, >> >> Am Mittwoch, den 02.07.2014, 15:08 +0100 schrieb Peter Griffin: >>> This series adds reset controller support for the STiH407 SoC. >>> >>> Changes since v1 >>> - Update copyright to 2014 >>> - Add const qualifier >>> - Fix various whitespace issues >>> - Remove THIS_OWNER >>> - Move DT documentation into separate patch >>> >>> Peter Griffin (4): >>> reset: stih407: Add softreset, powerdown and picophy controllers >>> reset: sti: Document sti-picophyreset controllers bindings. >>> ARM: sti: Add STiH407 Kconfig entry to select STIH407_RESET >>> ARM: sti: Add STiH407 reset controller support. >>> >>> .../bindings/reset/st,sti-picophyreset.txt | 42 ++++++ >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407.dtsi | 16 +++ >>> arch/arm/mach-sti/Kconfig | 10 ++ >>> drivers/reset/sti/Kconfig | 4 + >>> drivers/reset/sti/Makefile | 1 + >>> drivers/reset/sti/reset-stih407.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++ >>> .../dt-bindings/reset-controller/stih407-resets.h | 61 ++++++++ >>> 7 files changed, 292 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/st,sti-picophyreset.txt >>> create mode 100644 drivers/reset/sti/reset-stih407.c >>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/stih407-resets.h >> >> Looks good to me now. >> >> Acked-by: Philipp Zabel > > Do you have a tree for Reset? If not, which route do these patches > normally follow? > I will queue patch 4 to STi DT branch for v3.17. For now, no nodes uses reset for STiH407, so we don't need the dt-bindings header file in the STi tree. If we have a DT node using a reset line before my pull-request, I might have to integrate the series in the STi DT branch. Philipp, does that sound reasonable? Regards, Maxime From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Coquelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add reset controllers for STiH407 SoC Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 10:06:21 +0200 Message-ID: <53B50EFD.2070007@st.com> References: <1404310129-14667-1-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <1404317194.4109.13.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de> <20140702165924.GB17665@lee--X1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140702165924.GB17665@lee--X1> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Lee Jones , Philipp Zabel Cc: Peter Griffin , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, srinivas.kandagatla-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, patrice.chotard-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 07/02/2014 06:59 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote: > >> Hi Peter, >> >> Am Mittwoch, den 02.07.2014, 15:08 +0100 schrieb Peter Griffin: >>> This series adds reset controller support for the STiH407 SoC. >>> >>> Changes since v1 >>> - Update copyright to 2014 >>> - Add const qualifier >>> - Fix various whitespace issues >>> - Remove THIS_OWNER >>> - Move DT documentation into separate patch >>> >>> Peter Griffin (4): >>> reset: stih407: Add softreset, powerdown and picophy controllers >>> reset: sti: Document sti-picophyreset controllers bindings. >>> ARM: sti: Add STiH407 Kconfig entry to select STIH407_RESET >>> ARM: sti: Add STiH407 reset controller support. >>> >>> .../bindings/reset/st,sti-picophyreset.txt | 42 ++++++ >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407.dtsi | 16 +++ >>> arch/arm/mach-sti/Kconfig | 10 ++ >>> drivers/reset/sti/Kconfig | 4 + >>> drivers/reset/sti/Makefile | 1 + >>> drivers/reset/sti/reset-stih407.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++ >>> .../dt-bindings/reset-controller/stih407-resets.h | 61 ++++++++ >>> 7 files changed, 292 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/st,sti-picophyreset.txt >>> create mode 100644 drivers/reset/sti/reset-stih407.c >>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/stih407-resets.h >> >> Looks good to me now. >> >> Acked-by: Philipp Zabel > > Do you have a tree for Reset? If not, which route do these patches > normally follow? > I will queue patch 4 to STi DT branch for v3.17. For now, no nodes uses reset for STiH407, so we don't need the dt-bindings header file in the STi tree. If we have a DT node using a reset line before my pull-request, I might have to integrate the series in the STi DT branch. Philipp, does that sound reasonable? Regards, Maxime -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756905AbaGCIH3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2014 04:07:29 -0400 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93]:36256 "EHLO mx08-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756220AbaGCIHO (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2014 04:07:14 -0400 Message-ID: <53B50EFD.2070007@st.com> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 10:06:21 +0200 From: Maxime Coquelin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lee Jones , Philipp Zabel Cc: Peter Griffin , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add reset controllers for STiH407 SoC References: <1404310129-14667-1-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <1404317194.4109.13.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de> <20140702165924.GB17665@lee--X1> In-Reply-To: <20140702165924.GB17665@lee--X1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.201.23.80] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52,1.0.14,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-07-03_03:2014-07-02,2014-07-03,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/02/2014 06:59 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote: > >> Hi Peter, >> >> Am Mittwoch, den 02.07.2014, 15:08 +0100 schrieb Peter Griffin: >>> This series adds reset controller support for the STiH407 SoC. >>> >>> Changes since v1 >>> - Update copyright to 2014 >>> - Add const qualifier >>> - Fix various whitespace issues >>> - Remove THIS_OWNER >>> - Move DT documentation into separate patch >>> >>> Peter Griffin (4): >>> reset: stih407: Add softreset, powerdown and picophy controllers >>> reset: sti: Document sti-picophyreset controllers bindings. >>> ARM: sti: Add STiH407 Kconfig entry to select STIH407_RESET >>> ARM: sti: Add STiH407 reset controller support. >>> >>> .../bindings/reset/st,sti-picophyreset.txt | 42 ++++++ >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407.dtsi | 16 +++ >>> arch/arm/mach-sti/Kconfig | 10 ++ >>> drivers/reset/sti/Kconfig | 4 + >>> drivers/reset/sti/Makefile | 1 + >>> drivers/reset/sti/reset-stih407.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++ >>> .../dt-bindings/reset-controller/stih407-resets.h | 61 ++++++++ >>> 7 files changed, 292 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/st,sti-picophyreset.txt >>> create mode 100644 drivers/reset/sti/reset-stih407.c >>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/stih407-resets.h >> >> Looks good to me now. >> >> Acked-by: Philipp Zabel > > Do you have a tree for Reset? If not, which route do these patches > normally follow? > I will queue patch 4 to STi DT branch for v3.17. For now, no nodes uses reset for STiH407, so we don't need the dt-bindings header file in the STi tree. If we have a DT node using a reset line before my pull-request, I might have to integrate the series in the STi DT branch. Philipp, does that sound reasonable? Regards, Maxime