From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Testing remapping for locally repairable codes Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 13:02:56 +0200 Message-ID: <53B53860.4070601@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XhttRqo5s8i1wGcNxwRkhP6VOlR9rQhTV" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:36740 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751198AbaGCLDD (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2014 07:03:03 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Samuel Just Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --XhttRqo5s8i1wGcNxwRkhP6VOlR9rQhTV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sam, After https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1890 is properly tested and merge= d, "remapping for locally repairable codes" https://github.com/ceph/ceph/= pull/1911 will follow. Should it be tested with the rados suite as well a= s upgrade/firefly-x ? http://pulpito.ceph.com/compare/?branch=3Dmaster&su= ite=3Drados seem to indicate that the rados suite has not been run agains= t master recently which makes it more difficult to sort out errors relate= d to the patch itself.=20 Do you have a suggestion ? Cheers --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --XhttRqo5s8i1wGcNxwRkhP6VOlR9rQhTV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlO1OGEACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23J9QCgj5J+syer4xxnZ8jqSMiCWNky r2oAoIpmHieQzZroWfqHqMdzx7aW1rgj =GCaO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XhttRqo5s8i1wGcNxwRkhP6VOlR9rQhTV--