From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5 v4] KVM: PPC: Alow kvmppc_get_last_inst() to fail
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 13:44:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B55E4A.3050408@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403909347-31622-5-git-send-email-mihai.caraman@freescale.com>
On 28.06.14 00:49, Mihai Caraman wrote:
> On book3e, guest last instruction is read on the exit path using load
> external pid (lwepx) dedicated instruction. This load operation may fail
> due to TLB eviction and execute-but-not-read entries.
>
> This patch lay down the path for an alternative solution to read the guest
> last instruction, by allowing kvmppc_get_lat_inst() function to fail.
> Architecture specific implmentations of kvmppc_load_last_inst() may read
> last guest instruction and instruct the emulation layer to re-execute the
> guest in case of failure.
>
> Make kvmppc_get_last_inst() definition common between architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - these changes compile on book3s, please validate the functionality and
> do the necessary adaptations!
> - common declaration and enum for kvmppc_load_last_inst()
> - remove kvmppc_read_inst() in a preceding patch
>
> v3:
> - rework patch description
> - add common definition for kvmppc_get_last_inst()
> - check return values in book3s code
>
> v2:
> - integrated kvmppc_get_last_inst() in book3s code and checked build
> - addressed cosmetic feedback
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h | 26 ------------------
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_booke.h | 5 ----
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 11 ++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c | 17 ++++--------
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++----------
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 3 +++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c | 6 +++++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c | 18 ++++++++-----
> arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 11 ++++++--
> 11 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> index ceb70aa..1300cd9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> @@ -276,32 +276,6 @@ static inline bool kvmppc_need_byteswap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return (kvmppc_get_msr(vcpu) & MSR_LE) != (MSR_KERNEL & MSR_LE);
> }
>
> -static inline u32 kvmppc_get_last_inst_internal(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ulong pc)
> -{
> - /* Load the instruction manually if it failed to do so in the
> - * exit path */
> - if (vcpu->arch.last_inst = KVM_INST_FETCH_FAILED)
> - kvmppc_ld(vcpu, &pc, sizeof(u32), &vcpu->arch.last_inst, false);
> -
> - return kvmppc_need_byteswap(vcpu) ? swab32(vcpu->arch.last_inst) :
> - vcpu->arch.last_inst;
> -}
> -
> -static inline u32 kvmppc_get_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - return kvmppc_get_last_inst_internal(vcpu, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu));
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Like kvmppc_get_last_inst(), but for fetching a sc instruction.
> - * Because the sc instruction sets SRR0 to point to the following
> - * instruction, we have to fetch from pc - 4.
> - */
> -static inline u32 kvmppc_get_last_sc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - return kvmppc_get_last_inst_internal(vcpu, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu) - 4);
> -}
> -
> static inline ulong kvmppc_get_fault_dar(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> return vcpu->arch.fault_dar;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_booke.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_booke.h
> index c7aed61..cbb1990 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_booke.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_booke.h
> @@ -69,11 +69,6 @@ static inline bool kvmppc_need_byteswap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static inline u32 kvmppc_get_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - return vcpu->arch.last_inst;
> -}
> -
> static inline void kvmppc_set_ctr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ulong val)
> {
> vcpu->arch.ctr = val;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> index e2fd5a1..ec326c8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ enum emulation_result {
> EMULATE_EXIT_USER, /* emulation requires exit to user-space */
> };
>
> +enum instruction_type {
> + INST_GENERIC,
> + INST_SC, /* system call */
> +};
> +
> extern int kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> extern int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> extern void kvmppc_handler_highmem(void);
> @@ -62,6 +67,9 @@ extern int kvmppc_handle_store(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> u64 val, unsigned int bytes,
> int is_default_endian);
>
> +extern int kvmppc_load_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + enum instruction_type type, u32 *inst);
> +
> extern int kvmppc_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_run *run,
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> extern int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> @@ -234,6 +242,22 @@ struct kvmppc_ops {
> extern struct kvmppc_ops *kvmppc_hv_ops;
> extern struct kvmppc_ops *kvmppc_pr_ops;
>
> +static inline int kvmppc_get_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + enum instruction_type type, u32 *inst)
> +{
> + int ret = EMULATE_DONE;
> +
> + /* Load the instruction manually if it failed to do so in the
> + * exit path */
> + if (vcpu->arch.last_inst = KVM_INST_FETCH_FAILED)
> + ret = kvmppc_load_last_inst(vcpu, type, &vcpu->arch.last_inst);
> +
> + *inst = kvmppc_need_byteswap(vcpu) ? swab32(vcpu->arch.last_inst) :
> + vcpu->arch.last_inst;
We swap needlessly when the translation failed, but I don't think it
really hurts.
> +
> + return ret;
So here we just return the return value of kvmppc_load_last_inst() ...
> +}
> +
> static inline bool is_kvmppc_hv_enabled(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> return kvm->arch.kvm_ops = kvmppc_hv_ops;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> index bd75902..c17f101 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> @@ -467,6 +467,17 @@ mmio:
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvmppc_ld);
>
> +int kvmppc_load_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum instruction_type type,
> + u32 *inst)
> +{
> + ulong pc = kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu);
> +
> + if (type = INST_SC)
> + pc -= 4;
> + return kvmppc_ld(vcpu, &pc, sizeof(u32), &vcpu->arch.last_inst, false);
... which simply returns the return value of kvmppc_ld(). However,
kvmppc_ld() returns -ENOENT when it doesn't find a translation. We need
to convert the return value space of kvmppc_ld() into an EMULATE_ name
space that makes sense for this function.
How about something like
r = kvmppc_ld();
if (r = EMULATE_DONE)
return r;
else
return EMULATE_AGAIN;
That way we make sure that we tell the caller only "yes, all is good" or
"please go back into the guest".
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvmppc_load_last_inst);
> +
> int kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> return 0;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> index 8056107..2c2b7ad 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> @@ -530,21 +530,14 @@ static int instruction_is_store(unsigned int instr)
> static int kvmppc_hv_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> unsigned long gpa, gva_t ea, int is_store)
> {
> - int ret;
> u32 last_inst;
> - unsigned long srr0 = kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu);
>
> - /* We try to load the last instruction. We don't let
> - * emulate_instruction do it as it doesn't check what
> - * kvmppc_ld returns.
> + /*
> * If we fail, we just return to the guest and try executing it again.
> */
> - if (vcpu->arch.last_inst = KVM_INST_FETCH_FAILED) {
> - ret = kvmppc_ld(vcpu, &srr0, sizeof(u32), &last_inst, false);
> - if (ret != EMULATE_DONE || last_inst = KVM_INST_FETCH_FAILED)
> - return RESUME_GUEST;
> - vcpu->arch.last_inst = last_inst;
> - }
> + if (kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst) !> + EMULATE_DONE)
> + return RESUME_GUEST;
This looks great.
>
> /*
> * WARNING: We do not know for sure whether the instruction we just
> @@ -558,7 +551,7 @@ static int kvmppc_hv_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> * we just return and retry the instruction.
> */
>
> - if (instruction_is_store(kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu)) != !!is_store)
> + if (instruction_is_store(last_inst) != !!is_store)
> return RESUME_GUEST;
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c
> index 6c8011f..bfb8035 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c
> @@ -639,26 +639,36 @@ static int kvmppc_ps_one_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool rc,
>
> int kvmppc_emulate_paired_single(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - u32 inst = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu);
> + u32 inst;
> enum emulation_result emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
> + int ax_rd, ax_ra, ax_rb, ax_rc;
> + short full_d;
> + u64 *fpr_d, *fpr_a, *fpr_b, *fpr_c;
>
> - int ax_rd = inst_get_field(inst, 6, 10);
> - int ax_ra = inst_get_field(inst, 11, 15);
> - int ax_rb = inst_get_field(inst, 16, 20);
> - int ax_rc = inst_get_field(inst, 21, 25);
> - short full_d = inst_get_field(inst, 16, 31);
> -
> - u64 *fpr_d = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rd);
> - u64 *fpr_a = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_ra);
> - u64 *fpr_b = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rb);
> - u64 *fpr_c = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rc);
> -
> - bool rcomp = (inst & 1) ? true : false;
> - u32 cr = kvmppc_get_cr(vcpu);
> + bool rcomp;
> + u32 cr;
> #ifdef DEBUG
> int i;
> #endif
>
> + emulated = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &inst);
> + if (emulated != EMULATE_DONE)
> + return emulated;
Here we're already leaking the "emulated" return value into the caller.
The caller in this chain should know what EMULATE_AGAIN means, so with
the change above we're safe.
> +
> + ax_rd = inst_get_field(inst, 6, 10);
> + ax_ra = inst_get_field(inst, 11, 15);
> + ax_rb = inst_get_field(inst, 16, 20);
> + ax_rc = inst_get_field(inst, 21, 25);
> + full_d = inst_get_field(inst, 16, 31);
> +
> + fpr_d = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rd);
> + fpr_a = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_ra);
> + fpr_b = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rb);
> + fpr_c = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rc);
> +
> + rcomp = (inst & 1) ? true : false;
> + cr = kvmppc_get_cr(vcpu);
> +
> if (!kvmppc_inst_is_paired_single(vcpu, inst))
> return EMULATE_FAIL;
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> index d247d88..7bbaeec 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> @@ -970,15 +970,24 @@ int kvmppc_handle_exit_pr(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> {
> enum emulation_result er;
> ulong flags;
> + u32 last_inst;
> + int emul;
>
> program_interrupt:
> flags = vcpu->arch.shadow_srr1 & 0x1f0000ull;
>
> + emul = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
> + if (emul != EMULATE_DONE) {
> + r = RESUME_GUEST;
Yes, this looks good.
> + break;
> + }
> +
> if (kvmppc_get_msr(vcpu) & MSR_PR) {
> #ifdef EXIT_DEBUG
> - printk(KERN_INFO "Userspace triggered 0x700 exception at 0x%lx (0x%x)\n", kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu), kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu));
> + pr_info("Userspace triggered 0x700 exception at\n 0x%lx (0x%x)\n",
> + kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu), last_inst);
> #endif
> - if ((kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu) & 0xff0007ff) !> + if ((last_inst & 0xff0007ff) !> (INS_DCBZ & 0xfffffff7)) {
> kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, flags);
> r = RESUME_GUEST;
> @@ -997,7 +1006,7 @@ program_interrupt:
> break;
> case EMULATE_FAIL:
> printk(KERN_CRIT "%s: emulation at %lx failed (%08x)\n",
> - __func__, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu), kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu));
> + __func__, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu), last_inst);
> kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, flags);
> r = RESUME_GUEST;
> break;
> @@ -1014,8 +1023,25 @@ program_interrupt:
> break;
> }
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_SYSCALL:
> + {
> + u32 last_sc;
> + int emul;
> +
> + /* Get last sc for papr */
> + if (vcpu->arch.papr_enabled) {
> + /*
> + * The sc instuction sets SRR0 to point to the next inst
> + */
> + emul = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_SC, &last_sc);
> + if (emul != EMULATE_DONE) {
> + kvmppc_set_pc(vcpu, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu) - 4);
> + r = RESUME_GUEST;
This also looks good :).
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (vcpu->arch.papr_enabled &&
> - (kvmppc_get_last_sc(vcpu) = 0x44000022) &&
> + (last_sc = 0x44000022) &&
> !(kvmppc_get_msr(vcpu) & MSR_PR)) {
> /* SC 1 papr hypercalls */
> ulong cmd = kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 3);
> @@ -1060,13 +1086,13 @@ program_interrupt:
> r = RESUME_GUEST;
> }
> break;
> + }
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_FP_UNAVAIL:
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_ALTIVEC:
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_VSX:
> {
> int ext_msr = 0;
> int emul;
> - ulong pc;
> u32 last_inst;
>
> if (!(vcpu->arch.hflags & BOOK3S_HFLAG_PAIRED_SINGLE)) {
> @@ -1090,9 +1116,7 @@ program_interrupt:
> break;
> }
>
> - pc = kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu);
> - last_inst = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu);
> - emul = kvmppc_ld(vcpu, &pc, sizeof(u32), &last_inst, false);
> + emul = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
> if (emul = EMULATE_DONE) {
> /* we need to emulate this instruction */
> goto program_interrupt;
> @@ -1105,9 +1129,8 @@ program_interrupt:
> }
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_ALIGNMENT:
> {
> - ulong pc = kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu);
> - u32 last_inst = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu);
> - int emul = kvmppc_ld(vcpu, &pc, sizeof(u32), &last_inst, false);
> + u32 last_inst;
> + int emul = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
>
> if (emul = EMULATE_DONE) {
> u32 dsisr;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> index ab62109..34a42b9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> @@ -752,6 +752,9 @@ static int emulation_exit(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * they were actually modified by emulation. */
> return RESUME_GUEST_NV;
>
> + case EMULATE_AGAIN:
> + return RESUME_GUEST;
Yup :).
> +
> case EMULATE_DO_DCR:
> run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DCR;
> return RESUME_HOST;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
> index dd2cc03..4b4e8d6 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
> @@ -606,6 +606,12 @@ void kvmppc_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 eaddr, gpa_t gpaddr,
> }
> }
>
> +int kvmppc_load_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum instruction_type type,
> + u32 *instr)
> +{
> + return EMULATE_FAIL;
This should be EMULATE_AGAIN, no?
> +}
> +
> /************* MMU Notifiers *************/
>
> int kvm_unmap_hva(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long hva)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
> index da86d9b..c5c64b6 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -224,19 +224,25 @@ static int kvmppc_emulate_mfspr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int sprn, int rt)
> * from opcode tables in the future. */
> int kvmppc_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - u32 inst = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu);
> - int ra = get_ra(inst);
> - int rs = get_rs(inst);
> - int rt = get_rt(inst);
> - int sprn = get_sprn(inst);
> - enum emulation_result emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
> + u32 inst;
> + int ra, rs, rt, sprn;
> + enum emulation_result emulated;
> int advance = 1;
>
> /* this default type might be overwritten by subcategories */
> kvmppc_set_exit_type(vcpu, EMULATED_INST_EXITS);
>
> + emulated = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, false, &inst);
> + if (emulated != EMULATE_DONE)
> + return emulated;
and here we're leaking again ;). It's perfectly fine to do so, but let's
make sure we don't leak -ENOENT :). So here too the fix above should
make things work.
Alex
> +
> pr_debug("Emulating opcode %d / %d\n", get_op(inst), get_xop(inst));
>
> + ra = get_ra(inst);
> + rs = get_rs(inst);
> + rt = get_rt(inst);
> + sprn = get_sprn(inst);
> +
> switch (get_op(inst)) {
> case OP_TRAP:
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index 7efc2b7..da54e4b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -261,6 +261,9 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * actually modified. */
> r = RESUME_GUEST_NV;
> break;
> + case EMULATE_AGAIN:
> + r = RESUME_GUEST;
> + break;
> case EMULATE_DO_MMIO:
> run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_MMIO;
> /* We must reload nonvolatiles because "update" load/store
> @@ -270,11 +273,15 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> r = RESUME_HOST_NV;
> break;
> case EMULATE_FAIL:
> + {
> + u32 last_inst;
> +
> + kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, false, &last_inst);
> /* XXX Deliver Program interrupt to guest. */
> - printk(KERN_EMERG "%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__,
> - kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu));
> + pr_emerg("%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__, last_inst);
> r = RESUME_HOST;
> break;
> + }
> default:
> WARN_ON(1);
> r = RESUME_GUEST;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5 v4] KVM: PPC: Alow kvmppc_get_last_inst() to fail
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 15:44:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B55E4A.3050408@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403909347-31622-5-git-send-email-mihai.caraman@freescale.com>
On 28.06.14 00:49, Mihai Caraman wrote:
> On book3e, guest last instruction is read on the exit path using load
> external pid (lwepx) dedicated instruction. This load operation may fail
> due to TLB eviction and execute-but-not-read entries.
>
> This patch lay down the path for an alternative solution to read the guest
> last instruction, by allowing kvmppc_get_lat_inst() function to fail.
> Architecture specific implmentations of kvmppc_load_last_inst() may read
> last guest instruction and instruct the emulation layer to re-execute the
> guest in case of failure.
>
> Make kvmppc_get_last_inst() definition common between architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - these changes compile on book3s, please validate the functionality and
> do the necessary adaptations!
> - common declaration and enum for kvmppc_load_last_inst()
> - remove kvmppc_read_inst() in a preceding patch
>
> v3:
> - rework patch description
> - add common definition for kvmppc_get_last_inst()
> - check return values in book3s code
>
> v2:
> - integrated kvmppc_get_last_inst() in book3s code and checked build
> - addressed cosmetic feedback
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h | 26 ------------------
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_booke.h | 5 ----
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 11 ++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c | 17 ++++--------
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++----------
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 3 +++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c | 6 +++++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c | 18 ++++++++-----
> arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 11 ++++++--
> 11 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> index ceb70aa..1300cd9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> @@ -276,32 +276,6 @@ static inline bool kvmppc_need_byteswap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return (kvmppc_get_msr(vcpu) & MSR_LE) != (MSR_KERNEL & MSR_LE);
> }
>
> -static inline u32 kvmppc_get_last_inst_internal(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ulong pc)
> -{
> - /* Load the instruction manually if it failed to do so in the
> - * exit path */
> - if (vcpu->arch.last_inst == KVM_INST_FETCH_FAILED)
> - kvmppc_ld(vcpu, &pc, sizeof(u32), &vcpu->arch.last_inst, false);
> -
> - return kvmppc_need_byteswap(vcpu) ? swab32(vcpu->arch.last_inst) :
> - vcpu->arch.last_inst;
> -}
> -
> -static inline u32 kvmppc_get_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - return kvmppc_get_last_inst_internal(vcpu, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu));
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Like kvmppc_get_last_inst(), but for fetching a sc instruction.
> - * Because the sc instruction sets SRR0 to point to the following
> - * instruction, we have to fetch from pc - 4.
> - */
> -static inline u32 kvmppc_get_last_sc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - return kvmppc_get_last_inst_internal(vcpu, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu) - 4);
> -}
> -
> static inline ulong kvmppc_get_fault_dar(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> return vcpu->arch.fault_dar;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_booke.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_booke.h
> index c7aed61..cbb1990 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_booke.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_booke.h
> @@ -69,11 +69,6 @@ static inline bool kvmppc_need_byteswap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static inline u32 kvmppc_get_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - return vcpu->arch.last_inst;
> -}
> -
> static inline void kvmppc_set_ctr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ulong val)
> {
> vcpu->arch.ctr = val;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> index e2fd5a1..ec326c8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ enum emulation_result {
> EMULATE_EXIT_USER, /* emulation requires exit to user-space */
> };
>
> +enum instruction_type {
> + INST_GENERIC,
> + INST_SC, /* system call */
> +};
> +
> extern int kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> extern int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> extern void kvmppc_handler_highmem(void);
> @@ -62,6 +67,9 @@ extern int kvmppc_handle_store(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> u64 val, unsigned int bytes,
> int is_default_endian);
>
> +extern int kvmppc_load_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + enum instruction_type type, u32 *inst);
> +
> extern int kvmppc_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_run *run,
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> extern int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> @@ -234,6 +242,22 @@ struct kvmppc_ops {
> extern struct kvmppc_ops *kvmppc_hv_ops;
> extern struct kvmppc_ops *kvmppc_pr_ops;
>
> +static inline int kvmppc_get_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + enum instruction_type type, u32 *inst)
> +{
> + int ret = EMULATE_DONE;
> +
> + /* Load the instruction manually if it failed to do so in the
> + * exit path */
> + if (vcpu->arch.last_inst == KVM_INST_FETCH_FAILED)
> + ret = kvmppc_load_last_inst(vcpu, type, &vcpu->arch.last_inst);
> +
> + *inst = kvmppc_need_byteswap(vcpu) ? swab32(vcpu->arch.last_inst) :
> + vcpu->arch.last_inst;
We swap needlessly when the translation failed, but I don't think it
really hurts.
> +
> + return ret;
So here we just return the return value of kvmppc_load_last_inst() ...
> +}
> +
> static inline bool is_kvmppc_hv_enabled(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> return kvm->arch.kvm_ops == kvmppc_hv_ops;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> index bd75902..c17f101 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> @@ -467,6 +467,17 @@ mmio:
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvmppc_ld);
>
> +int kvmppc_load_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum instruction_type type,
> + u32 *inst)
> +{
> + ulong pc = kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu);
> +
> + if (type == INST_SC)
> + pc -= 4;
> + return kvmppc_ld(vcpu, &pc, sizeof(u32), &vcpu->arch.last_inst, false);
... which simply returns the return value of kvmppc_ld(). However,
kvmppc_ld() returns -ENOENT when it doesn't find a translation. We need
to convert the return value space of kvmppc_ld() into an EMULATE_ name
space that makes sense for this function.
How about something like
r = kvmppc_ld();
if (r == EMULATE_DONE)
return r;
else
return EMULATE_AGAIN;
That way we make sure that we tell the caller only "yes, all is good" or
"please go back into the guest".
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvmppc_load_last_inst);
> +
> int kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> return 0;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> index 8056107..2c2b7ad 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> @@ -530,21 +530,14 @@ static int instruction_is_store(unsigned int instr)
> static int kvmppc_hv_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> unsigned long gpa, gva_t ea, int is_store)
> {
> - int ret;
> u32 last_inst;
> - unsigned long srr0 = kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu);
>
> - /* We try to load the last instruction. We don't let
> - * emulate_instruction do it as it doesn't check what
> - * kvmppc_ld returns.
> + /*
> * If we fail, we just return to the guest and try executing it again.
> */
> - if (vcpu->arch.last_inst == KVM_INST_FETCH_FAILED) {
> - ret = kvmppc_ld(vcpu, &srr0, sizeof(u32), &last_inst, false);
> - if (ret != EMULATE_DONE || last_inst == KVM_INST_FETCH_FAILED)
> - return RESUME_GUEST;
> - vcpu->arch.last_inst = last_inst;
> - }
> + if (kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst) !=
> + EMULATE_DONE)
> + return RESUME_GUEST;
This looks great.
>
> /*
> * WARNING: We do not know for sure whether the instruction we just
> @@ -558,7 +551,7 @@ static int kvmppc_hv_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> * we just return and retry the instruction.
> */
>
> - if (instruction_is_store(kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu)) != !!is_store)
> + if (instruction_is_store(last_inst) != !!is_store)
> return RESUME_GUEST;
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c
> index 6c8011f..bfb8035 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c
> @@ -639,26 +639,36 @@ static int kvmppc_ps_one_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool rc,
>
> int kvmppc_emulate_paired_single(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - u32 inst = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu);
> + u32 inst;
> enum emulation_result emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
> + int ax_rd, ax_ra, ax_rb, ax_rc;
> + short full_d;
> + u64 *fpr_d, *fpr_a, *fpr_b, *fpr_c;
>
> - int ax_rd = inst_get_field(inst, 6, 10);
> - int ax_ra = inst_get_field(inst, 11, 15);
> - int ax_rb = inst_get_field(inst, 16, 20);
> - int ax_rc = inst_get_field(inst, 21, 25);
> - short full_d = inst_get_field(inst, 16, 31);
> -
> - u64 *fpr_d = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rd);
> - u64 *fpr_a = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_ra);
> - u64 *fpr_b = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rb);
> - u64 *fpr_c = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rc);
> -
> - bool rcomp = (inst & 1) ? true : false;
> - u32 cr = kvmppc_get_cr(vcpu);
> + bool rcomp;
> + u32 cr;
> #ifdef DEBUG
> int i;
> #endif
>
> + emulated = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &inst);
> + if (emulated != EMULATE_DONE)
> + return emulated;
Here we're already leaking the "emulated" return value into the caller.
The caller in this chain should know what EMULATE_AGAIN means, so with
the change above we're safe.
> +
> + ax_rd = inst_get_field(inst, 6, 10);
> + ax_ra = inst_get_field(inst, 11, 15);
> + ax_rb = inst_get_field(inst, 16, 20);
> + ax_rc = inst_get_field(inst, 21, 25);
> + full_d = inst_get_field(inst, 16, 31);
> +
> + fpr_d = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rd);
> + fpr_a = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_ra);
> + fpr_b = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rb);
> + fpr_c = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rc);
> +
> + rcomp = (inst & 1) ? true : false;
> + cr = kvmppc_get_cr(vcpu);
> +
> if (!kvmppc_inst_is_paired_single(vcpu, inst))
> return EMULATE_FAIL;
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> index d247d88..7bbaeec 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> @@ -970,15 +970,24 @@ int kvmppc_handle_exit_pr(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> {
> enum emulation_result er;
> ulong flags;
> + u32 last_inst;
> + int emul;
>
> program_interrupt:
> flags = vcpu->arch.shadow_srr1 & 0x1f0000ull;
>
> + emul = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
> + if (emul != EMULATE_DONE) {
> + r = RESUME_GUEST;
Yes, this looks good.
> + break;
> + }
> +
> if (kvmppc_get_msr(vcpu) & MSR_PR) {
> #ifdef EXIT_DEBUG
> - printk(KERN_INFO "Userspace triggered 0x700 exception at 0x%lx (0x%x)\n", kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu), kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu));
> + pr_info("Userspace triggered 0x700 exception at\n 0x%lx (0x%x)\n",
> + kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu), last_inst);
> #endif
> - if ((kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu) & 0xff0007ff) !=
> + if ((last_inst & 0xff0007ff) !=
> (INS_DCBZ & 0xfffffff7)) {
> kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, flags);
> r = RESUME_GUEST;
> @@ -997,7 +1006,7 @@ program_interrupt:
> break;
> case EMULATE_FAIL:
> printk(KERN_CRIT "%s: emulation at %lx failed (%08x)\n",
> - __func__, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu), kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu));
> + __func__, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu), last_inst);
> kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, flags);
> r = RESUME_GUEST;
> break;
> @@ -1014,8 +1023,25 @@ program_interrupt:
> break;
> }
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_SYSCALL:
> + {
> + u32 last_sc;
> + int emul;
> +
> + /* Get last sc for papr */
> + if (vcpu->arch.papr_enabled) {
> + /*
> + * The sc instuction sets SRR0 to point to the next inst
> + */
> + emul = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_SC, &last_sc);
> + if (emul != EMULATE_DONE) {
> + kvmppc_set_pc(vcpu, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu) - 4);
> + r = RESUME_GUEST;
This also looks good :).
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (vcpu->arch.papr_enabled &&
> - (kvmppc_get_last_sc(vcpu) == 0x44000022) &&
> + (last_sc == 0x44000022) &&
> !(kvmppc_get_msr(vcpu) & MSR_PR)) {
> /* SC 1 papr hypercalls */
> ulong cmd = kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 3);
> @@ -1060,13 +1086,13 @@ program_interrupt:
> r = RESUME_GUEST;
> }
> break;
> + }
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_FP_UNAVAIL:
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_ALTIVEC:
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_VSX:
> {
> int ext_msr = 0;
> int emul;
> - ulong pc;
> u32 last_inst;
>
> if (!(vcpu->arch.hflags & BOOK3S_HFLAG_PAIRED_SINGLE)) {
> @@ -1090,9 +1116,7 @@ program_interrupt:
> break;
> }
>
> - pc = kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu);
> - last_inst = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu);
> - emul = kvmppc_ld(vcpu, &pc, sizeof(u32), &last_inst, false);
> + emul = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
> if (emul == EMULATE_DONE) {
> /* we need to emulate this instruction */
> goto program_interrupt;
> @@ -1105,9 +1129,8 @@ program_interrupt:
> }
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_ALIGNMENT:
> {
> - ulong pc = kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu);
> - u32 last_inst = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu);
> - int emul = kvmppc_ld(vcpu, &pc, sizeof(u32), &last_inst, false);
> + u32 last_inst;
> + int emul = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
>
> if (emul == EMULATE_DONE) {
> u32 dsisr;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> index ab62109..34a42b9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> @@ -752,6 +752,9 @@ static int emulation_exit(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * they were actually modified by emulation. */
> return RESUME_GUEST_NV;
>
> + case EMULATE_AGAIN:
> + return RESUME_GUEST;
Yup :).
> +
> case EMULATE_DO_DCR:
> run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DCR;
> return RESUME_HOST;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
> index dd2cc03..4b4e8d6 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
> @@ -606,6 +606,12 @@ void kvmppc_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 eaddr, gpa_t gpaddr,
> }
> }
>
> +int kvmppc_load_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum instruction_type type,
> + u32 *instr)
> +{
> + return EMULATE_FAIL;
This should be EMULATE_AGAIN, no?
> +}
> +
> /************* MMU Notifiers *************/
>
> int kvm_unmap_hva(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long hva)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
> index da86d9b..c5c64b6 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -224,19 +224,25 @@ static int kvmppc_emulate_mfspr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int sprn, int rt)
> * from opcode tables in the future. */
> int kvmppc_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - u32 inst = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu);
> - int ra = get_ra(inst);
> - int rs = get_rs(inst);
> - int rt = get_rt(inst);
> - int sprn = get_sprn(inst);
> - enum emulation_result emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
> + u32 inst;
> + int ra, rs, rt, sprn;
> + enum emulation_result emulated;
> int advance = 1;
>
> /* this default type might be overwritten by subcategories */
> kvmppc_set_exit_type(vcpu, EMULATED_INST_EXITS);
>
> + emulated = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, false, &inst);
> + if (emulated != EMULATE_DONE)
> + return emulated;
and here we're leaking again ;). It's perfectly fine to do so, but let's
make sure we don't leak -ENOENT :). So here too the fix above should
make things work.
Alex
> +
> pr_debug("Emulating opcode %d / %d\n", get_op(inst), get_xop(inst));
>
> + ra = get_ra(inst);
> + rs = get_rs(inst);
> + rt = get_rt(inst);
> + sprn = get_sprn(inst);
> +
> switch (get_op(inst)) {
> case OP_TRAP:
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index 7efc2b7..da54e4b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -261,6 +261,9 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * actually modified. */
> r = RESUME_GUEST_NV;
> break;
> + case EMULATE_AGAIN:
> + r = RESUME_GUEST;
> + break;
> case EMULATE_DO_MMIO:
> run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_MMIO;
> /* We must reload nonvolatiles because "update" load/store
> @@ -270,11 +273,15 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> r = RESUME_HOST_NV;
> break;
> case EMULATE_FAIL:
> + {
> + u32 last_inst;
> +
> + kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, false, &last_inst);
> /* XXX Deliver Program interrupt to guest. */
> - printk(KERN_EMERG "%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__,
> - kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu));
> + pr_emerg("%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__, last_inst);
> r = RESUME_HOST;
> break;
> + }
> default:
> WARN_ON(1);
> r = RESUME_GUEST;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5 v4] KVM: PPC: Alow kvmppc_get_last_inst() to fail
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 15:44:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B55E4A.3050408@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403909347-31622-5-git-send-email-mihai.caraman@freescale.com>
On 28.06.14 00:49, Mihai Caraman wrote:
> On book3e, guest last instruction is read on the exit path using load
> external pid (lwepx) dedicated instruction. This load operation may fail
> due to TLB eviction and execute-but-not-read entries.
>
> This patch lay down the path for an alternative solution to read the guest
> last instruction, by allowing kvmppc_get_lat_inst() function to fail.
> Architecture specific implmentations of kvmppc_load_last_inst() may read
> last guest instruction and instruct the emulation layer to re-execute the
> guest in case of failure.
>
> Make kvmppc_get_last_inst() definition common between architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - these changes compile on book3s, please validate the functionality and
> do the necessary adaptations!
> - common declaration and enum for kvmppc_load_last_inst()
> - remove kvmppc_read_inst() in a preceding patch
>
> v3:
> - rework patch description
> - add common definition for kvmppc_get_last_inst()
> - check return values in book3s code
>
> v2:
> - integrated kvmppc_get_last_inst() in book3s code and checked build
> - addressed cosmetic feedback
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h | 26 ------------------
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_booke.h | 5 ----
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 11 ++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c | 17 ++++--------
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++----------
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 3 +++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c | 6 +++++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c | 18 ++++++++-----
> arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 11 ++++++--
> 11 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> index ceb70aa..1300cd9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h
> @@ -276,32 +276,6 @@ static inline bool kvmppc_need_byteswap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return (kvmppc_get_msr(vcpu) & MSR_LE) != (MSR_KERNEL & MSR_LE);
> }
>
> -static inline u32 kvmppc_get_last_inst_internal(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ulong pc)
> -{
> - /* Load the instruction manually if it failed to do so in the
> - * exit path */
> - if (vcpu->arch.last_inst == KVM_INST_FETCH_FAILED)
> - kvmppc_ld(vcpu, &pc, sizeof(u32), &vcpu->arch.last_inst, false);
> -
> - return kvmppc_need_byteswap(vcpu) ? swab32(vcpu->arch.last_inst) :
> - vcpu->arch.last_inst;
> -}
> -
> -static inline u32 kvmppc_get_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - return kvmppc_get_last_inst_internal(vcpu, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu));
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Like kvmppc_get_last_inst(), but for fetching a sc instruction.
> - * Because the sc instruction sets SRR0 to point to the following
> - * instruction, we have to fetch from pc - 4.
> - */
> -static inline u32 kvmppc_get_last_sc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - return kvmppc_get_last_inst_internal(vcpu, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu) - 4);
> -}
> -
> static inline ulong kvmppc_get_fault_dar(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> return vcpu->arch.fault_dar;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_booke.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_booke.h
> index c7aed61..cbb1990 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_booke.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_booke.h
> @@ -69,11 +69,6 @@ static inline bool kvmppc_need_byteswap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static inline u32 kvmppc_get_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - return vcpu->arch.last_inst;
> -}
> -
> static inline void kvmppc_set_ctr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ulong val)
> {
> vcpu->arch.ctr = val;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> index e2fd5a1..ec326c8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ enum emulation_result {
> EMULATE_EXIT_USER, /* emulation requires exit to user-space */
> };
>
> +enum instruction_type {
> + INST_GENERIC,
> + INST_SC, /* system call */
> +};
> +
> extern int kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> extern int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> extern void kvmppc_handler_highmem(void);
> @@ -62,6 +67,9 @@ extern int kvmppc_handle_store(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> u64 val, unsigned int bytes,
> int is_default_endian);
>
> +extern int kvmppc_load_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + enum instruction_type type, u32 *inst);
> +
> extern int kvmppc_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_run *run,
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> extern int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> @@ -234,6 +242,22 @@ struct kvmppc_ops {
> extern struct kvmppc_ops *kvmppc_hv_ops;
> extern struct kvmppc_ops *kvmppc_pr_ops;
>
> +static inline int kvmppc_get_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + enum instruction_type type, u32 *inst)
> +{
> + int ret = EMULATE_DONE;
> +
> + /* Load the instruction manually if it failed to do so in the
> + * exit path */
> + if (vcpu->arch.last_inst == KVM_INST_FETCH_FAILED)
> + ret = kvmppc_load_last_inst(vcpu, type, &vcpu->arch.last_inst);
> +
> + *inst = kvmppc_need_byteswap(vcpu) ? swab32(vcpu->arch.last_inst) :
> + vcpu->arch.last_inst;
We swap needlessly when the translation failed, but I don't think it
really hurts.
> +
> + return ret;
So here we just return the return value of kvmppc_load_last_inst() ...
> +}
> +
> static inline bool is_kvmppc_hv_enabled(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> return kvm->arch.kvm_ops == kvmppc_hv_ops;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> index bd75902..c17f101 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> @@ -467,6 +467,17 @@ mmio:
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvmppc_ld);
>
> +int kvmppc_load_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum instruction_type type,
> + u32 *inst)
> +{
> + ulong pc = kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu);
> +
> + if (type == INST_SC)
> + pc -= 4;
> + return kvmppc_ld(vcpu, &pc, sizeof(u32), &vcpu->arch.last_inst, false);
... which simply returns the return value of kvmppc_ld(). However,
kvmppc_ld() returns -ENOENT when it doesn't find a translation. We need
to convert the return value space of kvmppc_ld() into an EMULATE_ name
space that makes sense for this function.
How about something like
r = kvmppc_ld();
if (r == EMULATE_DONE)
return r;
else
return EMULATE_AGAIN;
That way we make sure that we tell the caller only "yes, all is good" or
"please go back into the guest".
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvmppc_load_last_inst);
> +
> int kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> return 0;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> index 8056107..2c2b7ad 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> @@ -530,21 +530,14 @@ static int instruction_is_store(unsigned int instr)
> static int kvmppc_hv_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> unsigned long gpa, gva_t ea, int is_store)
> {
> - int ret;
> u32 last_inst;
> - unsigned long srr0 = kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu);
>
> - /* We try to load the last instruction. We don't let
> - * emulate_instruction do it as it doesn't check what
> - * kvmppc_ld returns.
> + /*
> * If we fail, we just return to the guest and try executing it again.
> */
> - if (vcpu->arch.last_inst == KVM_INST_FETCH_FAILED) {
> - ret = kvmppc_ld(vcpu, &srr0, sizeof(u32), &last_inst, false);
> - if (ret != EMULATE_DONE || last_inst == KVM_INST_FETCH_FAILED)
> - return RESUME_GUEST;
> - vcpu->arch.last_inst = last_inst;
> - }
> + if (kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst) !=
> + EMULATE_DONE)
> + return RESUME_GUEST;
This looks great.
>
> /*
> * WARNING: We do not know for sure whether the instruction we just
> @@ -558,7 +551,7 @@ static int kvmppc_hv_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> * we just return and retry the instruction.
> */
>
> - if (instruction_is_store(kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu)) != !!is_store)
> + if (instruction_is_store(last_inst) != !!is_store)
> return RESUME_GUEST;
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c
> index 6c8011f..bfb8035 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_paired_singles.c
> @@ -639,26 +639,36 @@ static int kvmppc_ps_one_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool rc,
>
> int kvmppc_emulate_paired_single(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - u32 inst = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu);
> + u32 inst;
> enum emulation_result emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
> + int ax_rd, ax_ra, ax_rb, ax_rc;
> + short full_d;
> + u64 *fpr_d, *fpr_a, *fpr_b, *fpr_c;
>
> - int ax_rd = inst_get_field(inst, 6, 10);
> - int ax_ra = inst_get_field(inst, 11, 15);
> - int ax_rb = inst_get_field(inst, 16, 20);
> - int ax_rc = inst_get_field(inst, 21, 25);
> - short full_d = inst_get_field(inst, 16, 31);
> -
> - u64 *fpr_d = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rd);
> - u64 *fpr_a = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_ra);
> - u64 *fpr_b = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rb);
> - u64 *fpr_c = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rc);
> -
> - bool rcomp = (inst & 1) ? true : false;
> - u32 cr = kvmppc_get_cr(vcpu);
> + bool rcomp;
> + u32 cr;
> #ifdef DEBUG
> int i;
> #endif
>
> + emulated = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &inst);
> + if (emulated != EMULATE_DONE)
> + return emulated;
Here we're already leaking the "emulated" return value into the caller.
The caller in this chain should know what EMULATE_AGAIN means, so with
the change above we're safe.
> +
> + ax_rd = inst_get_field(inst, 6, 10);
> + ax_ra = inst_get_field(inst, 11, 15);
> + ax_rb = inst_get_field(inst, 16, 20);
> + ax_rc = inst_get_field(inst, 21, 25);
> + full_d = inst_get_field(inst, 16, 31);
> +
> + fpr_d = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rd);
> + fpr_a = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_ra);
> + fpr_b = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rb);
> + fpr_c = &VCPU_FPR(vcpu, ax_rc);
> +
> + rcomp = (inst & 1) ? true : false;
> + cr = kvmppc_get_cr(vcpu);
> +
> if (!kvmppc_inst_is_paired_single(vcpu, inst))
> return EMULATE_FAIL;
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> index d247d88..7bbaeec 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> @@ -970,15 +970,24 @@ int kvmppc_handle_exit_pr(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> {
> enum emulation_result er;
> ulong flags;
> + u32 last_inst;
> + int emul;
>
> program_interrupt:
> flags = vcpu->arch.shadow_srr1 & 0x1f0000ull;
>
> + emul = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
> + if (emul != EMULATE_DONE) {
> + r = RESUME_GUEST;
Yes, this looks good.
> + break;
> + }
> +
> if (kvmppc_get_msr(vcpu) & MSR_PR) {
> #ifdef EXIT_DEBUG
> - printk(KERN_INFO "Userspace triggered 0x700 exception at 0x%lx (0x%x)\n", kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu), kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu));
> + pr_info("Userspace triggered 0x700 exception at\n 0x%lx (0x%x)\n",
> + kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu), last_inst);
> #endif
> - if ((kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu) & 0xff0007ff) !=
> + if ((last_inst & 0xff0007ff) !=
> (INS_DCBZ & 0xfffffff7)) {
> kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, flags);
> r = RESUME_GUEST;
> @@ -997,7 +1006,7 @@ program_interrupt:
> break;
> case EMULATE_FAIL:
> printk(KERN_CRIT "%s: emulation at %lx failed (%08x)\n",
> - __func__, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu), kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu));
> + __func__, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu), last_inst);
> kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, flags);
> r = RESUME_GUEST;
> break;
> @@ -1014,8 +1023,25 @@ program_interrupt:
> break;
> }
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_SYSCALL:
> + {
> + u32 last_sc;
> + int emul;
> +
> + /* Get last sc for papr */
> + if (vcpu->arch.papr_enabled) {
> + /*
> + * The sc instuction sets SRR0 to point to the next inst
> + */
> + emul = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_SC, &last_sc);
> + if (emul != EMULATE_DONE) {
> + kvmppc_set_pc(vcpu, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu) - 4);
> + r = RESUME_GUEST;
This also looks good :).
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (vcpu->arch.papr_enabled &&
> - (kvmppc_get_last_sc(vcpu) == 0x44000022) &&
> + (last_sc == 0x44000022) &&
> !(kvmppc_get_msr(vcpu) & MSR_PR)) {
> /* SC 1 papr hypercalls */
> ulong cmd = kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 3);
> @@ -1060,13 +1086,13 @@ program_interrupt:
> r = RESUME_GUEST;
> }
> break;
> + }
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_FP_UNAVAIL:
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_ALTIVEC:
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_VSX:
> {
> int ext_msr = 0;
> int emul;
> - ulong pc;
> u32 last_inst;
>
> if (!(vcpu->arch.hflags & BOOK3S_HFLAG_PAIRED_SINGLE)) {
> @@ -1090,9 +1116,7 @@ program_interrupt:
> break;
> }
>
> - pc = kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu);
> - last_inst = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu);
> - emul = kvmppc_ld(vcpu, &pc, sizeof(u32), &last_inst, false);
> + emul = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
> if (emul == EMULATE_DONE) {
> /* we need to emulate this instruction */
> goto program_interrupt;
> @@ -1105,9 +1129,8 @@ program_interrupt:
> }
> case BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_ALIGNMENT:
> {
> - ulong pc = kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu);
> - u32 last_inst = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu);
> - int emul = kvmppc_ld(vcpu, &pc, sizeof(u32), &last_inst, false);
> + u32 last_inst;
> + int emul = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
>
> if (emul == EMULATE_DONE) {
> u32 dsisr;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> index ab62109..34a42b9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> @@ -752,6 +752,9 @@ static int emulation_exit(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * they were actually modified by emulation. */
> return RESUME_GUEST_NV;
>
> + case EMULATE_AGAIN:
> + return RESUME_GUEST;
Yup :).
> +
> case EMULATE_DO_DCR:
> run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DCR;
> return RESUME_HOST;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
> index dd2cc03..4b4e8d6 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
> @@ -606,6 +606,12 @@ void kvmppc_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 eaddr, gpa_t gpaddr,
> }
> }
>
> +int kvmppc_load_last_inst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum instruction_type type,
> + u32 *instr)
> +{
> + return EMULATE_FAIL;
This should be EMULATE_AGAIN, no?
> +}
> +
> /************* MMU Notifiers *************/
>
> int kvm_unmap_hva(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long hva)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
> index da86d9b..c5c64b6 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -224,19 +224,25 @@ static int kvmppc_emulate_mfspr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int sprn, int rt)
> * from opcode tables in the future. */
> int kvmppc_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - u32 inst = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu);
> - int ra = get_ra(inst);
> - int rs = get_rs(inst);
> - int rt = get_rt(inst);
> - int sprn = get_sprn(inst);
> - enum emulation_result emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
> + u32 inst;
> + int ra, rs, rt, sprn;
> + enum emulation_result emulated;
> int advance = 1;
>
> /* this default type might be overwritten by subcategories */
> kvmppc_set_exit_type(vcpu, EMULATED_INST_EXITS);
>
> + emulated = kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, false, &inst);
> + if (emulated != EMULATE_DONE)
> + return emulated;
and here we're leaking again ;). It's perfectly fine to do so, but let's
make sure we don't leak -ENOENT :). So here too the fix above should
make things work.
Alex
> +
> pr_debug("Emulating opcode %d / %d\n", get_op(inst), get_xop(inst));
>
> + ra = get_ra(inst);
> + rs = get_rs(inst);
> + rt = get_rt(inst);
> + sprn = get_sprn(inst);
> +
> switch (get_op(inst)) {
> case OP_TRAP:
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index 7efc2b7..da54e4b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -261,6 +261,9 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * actually modified. */
> r = RESUME_GUEST_NV;
> break;
> + case EMULATE_AGAIN:
> + r = RESUME_GUEST;
> + break;
> case EMULATE_DO_MMIO:
> run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_MMIO;
> /* We must reload nonvolatiles because "update" load/store
> @@ -270,11 +273,15 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> r = RESUME_HOST_NV;
> break;
> case EMULATE_FAIL:
> + {
> + u32 last_inst;
> +
> + kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, false, &last_inst);
> /* XXX Deliver Program interrupt to guest. */
> - printk(KERN_EMERG "%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__,
> - kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu));
> + pr_emerg("%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__, last_inst);
> r = RESUME_HOST;
> break;
> + }
> default:
> WARN_ON(1);
> r = RESUME_GUEST;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-03 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-27 22:49 [PATCH 0/5 v4] Read guest last instruction from kvmppc_get_last_inst() Mihai Caraman
2014-06-27 22:49 ` Mihai Caraman
2014-06-27 22:49 ` Mihai Caraman
2014-06-27 22:49 ` [PATCH 1/5 v4] KVM: PPC: e500mc: Revert "add load inst fixup" Mihai Caraman
2014-06-27 22:49 ` Mihai Caraman
2014-06-27 22:49 ` Mihai Caraman
2014-06-27 22:49 ` [PATCH 2/5 v4] KVM: PPC: Book3e: Add TLBSEL/TSIZE defines for MAS0/1 Mihai Caraman
2014-06-27 22:49 ` Mihai Caraman
2014-06-27 22:49 ` Mihai Caraman
2014-06-27 22:49 ` [PATCH 3/5 v4] KVM: PPC: Book3s: Remove kvmppc_read_inst() function Mihai Caraman
2014-06-27 22:49 ` Mihai Caraman
2014-06-27 22:49 ` Mihai Caraman
2014-07-03 13:37 ` Alexander Graf
2014-07-03 13:37 ` Alexander Graf
2014-07-03 13:37 ` Alexander Graf
2014-07-03 16:18 ` mihai.caraman
2014-07-03 16:18 ` mihai.caraman
2014-07-03 16:18 ` mihai.caraman
2014-07-03 16:25 ` Alexander Graf
2014-07-03 16:25 ` Alexander Graf
2014-07-03 16:25 ` Alexander Graf
2014-06-27 22:49 ` [PATCH 4/5 v4] KVM: PPC: Alow kvmppc_get_last_inst() to fail Mihai Caraman
2014-06-27 22:49 ` Mihai Caraman
2014-06-27 22:49 ` Mihai Caraman
2014-07-03 13:44 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2014-07-03 13:44 ` Alexander Graf
2014-07-03 13:44 ` Alexander Graf
2014-06-27 22:49 ` [PATCH 5/5 v4] KVM: PPC: Bookehv: Get vcpu's last instruction for emulation Mihai Caraman
2014-06-27 22:49 ` Mihai Caraman
2014-06-27 22:49 ` Mihai Caraman
2014-07-03 13:53 ` Alexander Graf
2014-07-03 13:53 ` Alexander Graf
2014-07-03 13:53 ` Alexander Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53B55E4A.3050408@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mihai.caraman@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.