All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] trivial cleanup for iommu/vt-d
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 17:29:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B673F4.1050205@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140704092209.GA13434-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

On 2014/7/4 17:22, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 08:37:46PM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
>>
>> Yijing Wang (6):
>>   iommu/vt-d: Use list_for_each_safe() to simplify code
>>   iommu/vt-d: move up no_iommu and dmar_disabled check
>>   iommu/vt-d: clear the redundant assignment in dmar_enable_qi
>>   iommu/vt-d: clear the redundant assignment for domain->nid
>>   iommu/vt-d: use inline function dma_pte_superpage instead of macros
>>   iommu/vt-d: fix reference count in iommu_prepare_isa
> 
> Applied patches 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6, thanks. Also added another patch
> on-top, see below.

Thanks a lot!

Yijing.

> 
>>From 77c704bebc5d023ece7af32ea18bc3508cdb0007 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 11:19:10 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Don't use magic number in dma_pte_superpage
> 
> Use the already defined DMA_PTE_LARGE_PAGE for testing
> instead of hardcoding the value again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> index 9b9f28e..5d86e93 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static inline bool dma_pte_present(struct dma_pte *pte)
>  
>  static inline bool dma_pte_superpage(struct dma_pte *pte)
>  {
> -	return (pte->val & (1 << 7));
> +	return (pte->val & DMA_PTE_LARGE_PAGE);
>  }
>  
>  static inline int first_pte_in_page(struct dma_pte *pte)
> 


-- 
Thanks!
Yijing

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] trivial cleanup for iommu/vt-d
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 17:29:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B673F4.1050205@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140704092209.GA13434@8bytes.org>

On 2014/7/4 17:22, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 08:37:46PM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
>>
>> Yijing Wang (6):
>>   iommu/vt-d: Use list_for_each_safe() to simplify code
>>   iommu/vt-d: move up no_iommu and dmar_disabled check
>>   iommu/vt-d: clear the redundant assignment in dmar_enable_qi
>>   iommu/vt-d: clear the redundant assignment for domain->nid
>>   iommu/vt-d: use inline function dma_pte_superpage instead of macros
>>   iommu/vt-d: fix reference count in iommu_prepare_isa
> 
> Applied patches 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6, thanks. Also added another patch
> on-top, see below.

Thanks a lot!

Yijing.

> 
>>From 77c704bebc5d023ece7af32ea18bc3508cdb0007 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 11:19:10 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Don't use magic number in dma_pte_superpage
> 
> Use the already defined DMA_PTE_LARGE_PAGE for testing
> instead of hardcoding the value again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> index 9b9f28e..5d86e93 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static inline bool dma_pte_present(struct dma_pte *pte)
>  
>  static inline bool dma_pte_superpage(struct dma_pte *pte)
>  {
> -	return (pte->val & (1 << 7));
> +	return (pte->val & DMA_PTE_LARGE_PAGE);
>  }
>  
>  static inline int first_pte_in_page(struct dma_pte *pte)
> 


-- 
Thanks!
Yijing


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-04  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-20 12:37 [PATCH 0/6] trivial cleanup for iommu/vt-d Yijing Wang
2014-05-20 12:37 ` Yijing Wang
     [not found] ` <1400589472-8544-1-git-send-email-wangyijing-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-20 12:37   ` [PATCH 1/6] iommu/vt-d: Use list_for_each_safe() to simplify code Yijing Wang
2014-05-20 12:37     ` Yijing Wang
2014-05-20 12:37   ` [PATCH 2/6] iommu/vt-d: move up no_iommu and dmar_disabled check Yijing Wang
2014-05-20 12:37     ` Yijing Wang
     [not found]     ` <1400589472-8544-3-git-send-email-wangyijing-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-04  9:06       ` Joerg Roedel
2014-07-04  9:06         ` Joerg Roedel
     [not found]         ` <20140704090640.GS26537-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-04  9:28           ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-04  9:28             ` Yijing Wang
2014-05-20 12:37   ` [PATCH 3/6] iommu/vt-d: clear the redundant assignment in dmar_enable_qi Yijing Wang
2014-05-20 12:37     ` Yijing Wang
2014-05-20 12:37   ` [PATCH 4/6] iommu/vt-d: clear the redundant assignment for domain->nid Yijing Wang
2014-05-20 12:37     ` Yijing Wang
2014-05-20 12:37   ` [PATCH 5/6] iommu/vt-d: use inline function dma_pte_superpage instead of macros Yijing Wang
2014-05-20 12:37     ` Yijing Wang
2014-05-20 12:37   ` [PATCH 6/6] iommu/vt-d: fix reference count in iommu_prepare_isa Yijing Wang
2014-05-20 12:37     ` Yijing Wang
2014-06-18  0:56   ` [PATCH 0/6] trivial cleanup for iommu/vt-d Yijing Wang
2014-06-18  0:56     ` Yijing Wang
2014-07-04  9:22   ` Joerg Roedel
2014-07-04  9:22     ` Joerg Roedel
     [not found]     ` <20140704092209.GA13434-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-04  9:29       ` Yijing Wang [this message]
2014-07-04  9:29         ` Yijing Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53B673F4.1050205@huawei.com \
    --to=wangyijing-hv44wf8li93qt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.