Re: [PATCH 2/2] ib_srp: 64bit LUN fixes

[Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>]

On 07/04/14 16:12, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 07/04/2014 03:48 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> I think storing the struct scsi_lun in the scsi_device is the right way
>> to go ahead.  Any "accessors" for 8 or 32-bit LUNs should be simply
>> enough by just ignoring bits in the array, so there's very little
>> performance overhead.
>>
>> If we can get rid of the old scalar LUN field that would be great,
>> and given that we know the printk format fallout already it doesn't look
>> like too much work.  Do you want to look into this?
>
> Already working on it.

That sounds great. Regarding the SRP initiator driver: if the "__be64
lun" declarations in <scsi/srp.h> are changed into "struct scsi_lun lun"
then that allows to encode / decode LUNs inside the SRP initiator
without having to cast the address of these "lun" members into struct
scsi_lun *. In case you would prefer me to have a look into this, please
let me know.

Bart.