From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id CD2F1E002AC; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 08:19:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D087E002A6 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 08:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (c-68-38-40-177.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [68.38.40.177]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6FE2284CB8 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 15:18:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53B6C5DC.4080207@mindchasers.com> Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 11:18:52 -0400 From: Bob Cochran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org References: <53B5899F.10805@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Minutes of FSL Community BSP Meeting in 2014-07-03 X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 15:19:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/04/2014 09:01 AM, Daiane Angolini wrote: >> On 07/03/14 12:38, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> Atendees >>> ... >> * Trevor Woerner >> > > > > I would like to know, as well, who preferred to be read only and was > present only as listener. I was listen-only due to my location yesterday, but I'll try to participate actively from now on. It's great that fsl & community will move to incorporate the meta-fsl-ppc layer. I intend to help in this area. Was a decision made on how to differentiate between community-bsp-imx and commmunity-bsp-qoriq with the latter including both arm and powerpc for qoriq devices? Or is the community working towards just maintaining a bsp for both iMX and QorIQ devices? For example, in the future, when I see a mail thread titled "fsl-community-bsp: signing up for testing", does this mean that we want to test both iMX and QorIQ platforms? Two different beasts with different developers and customers. Bob > > In my hangout window I remember I saw 19 attendees. Otavio, do you > have any additional stats from google regarding the listeners? > > Oh, is the video recorded in youtube? > > Daiane >