From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id AA72AE002AC; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:21:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81012E002A6 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (c-68-38-40-177.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [68.38.40.177]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B51228C282; Fri, 4 Jul 2014 17:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <53B6E294.1040202@mindchasers.com> Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 13:21:24 -0400 From: Bob Cochran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <53B5899F.10805@linaro.org> <53B6C5DC.4080207@mindchasers.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Minutes of FSL Community BSP Meeting in 2014-07-03 X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 17:21:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/04/2014 12:17 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Bob Cochran wrote: > ... >> For example, in the future, when I see a mail thread titled >> "fsl-community-bsp: signing up for testing", does this mean that we want to >> test both iMX and QorIQ platforms? Two different beasts with different >> developers and customers. > > I think so; we can have different test and can try to leverage the use > of tools for auto-testing to help on this regard. It's a great goal. I suggest that for now there should be some clarifications made up front to help the newcomer sort out the differences between qoriq and iMX support / maturity that they'll find on the community pages. There appears to be two landing pages for Freescale community bsp work product: 1) "Freescale Yocto Project main page": https://community.freescale.com/docs/DOC-1616 2) "FSL Community BSP": http://freescale.github.io If I come to either of these pages as a qoriq developer, I'm going to become confused because the reality of the situation is that if I want a stable, ready to use set of images or source that will build for qoriq, I need to go to Freescale's web site and download the latest SDK: http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=SDKLINUX As an aside, does Freescale formally test each official Yocto release (e.g., Daisy) against their suite of qoriq development boards? I think they just test their SDK. My intention is to continue iterating with the help of others on the "Notes about meta-fsl-ppc and QorIQ development..." that I emailed on 7/2. Perhaps the notes could become a QorIQ status page that both of the aforementioned landing sites could include? Bob > > I think the line between "different customers" is blurring and more > and more commonly we'll see integrated systems which has several > agents from the different product lines working together to provide a > solution for customers... >