From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1X40eh-0007ai-Ut for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 04:35:57 +0000 Message-ID: <53BA2393.8020409@candelatech.com> Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 21:35:31 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Question on beacon-miss handling. References: <53B808BF.8070000@candelatech.com> <53B8C4DF.5000308@candelatech.com> <21432.58953.39322.640936@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <53B90EB1.8020305@candelatech.com> <21434.5649.615843.633424@gargle.gargle.HOWL> In-Reply-To: <21434.5649.615843.633424@gargle.gargle.HOWL> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Sujith Manoharan Cc: Adrian Chadd , ath10k On 07/06/2014 08:37 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Ben Greear wrote: >> Maybe the driver should make this 0 instead of 2 then? >> hw.h:#define TARGET_10X_BMISS_OFFLOAD_MAX_VDEV 2 >> That would save resources in the firmware. > > Yes, it would. ath10k doesn't seem to be handling roam > events too, so maybe that can be set to 0 - not sure if > there are plans to properly enable and use roaming functionality > that is already in the firmware. I have set both to zero when using my firmware, and so far, everything seems to be working fine. I am tempted to just compile the roaming and beacon-miss code entirely out of the firmware to save a bit of memory, but I guess that might possibly break some driver, so if I do, I will have to add a new firmware image variant... Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k