From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] tty: serial: 8250 core: add runtime pm Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 18:32:51 +0200 Message-ID: <53BD6EB3.4020305@linutronix.de> References: <1404491651-1388-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <1404491651-1388-3-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20140707142056.46f61cf9@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> <20140709111705.GR28884@atomide.com> <53BD291D.3040307@linutronix.de> <20140709114837.GU28884@atomide.com> <53BD38D3.2000204@linutronix.de> <20140709151242.GY28884@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140709151242.GY28884@atomide.com> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: One Thousand Gnomes , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, balbi@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 07/09/2014 05:12 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > And also please note that for runtime PM the wake-up events need > to be always enabled, so the device_may_wakeup() checks should > be only implemented for suspend and resume. I think I got that > corrected for most part in omap-serial.c recently, but knowing > that might reduce the confusion a bit :) Ehm. I also added it to omap_8250_pm() as it is done in omap-serial (in serial_omap_pm()). Should I get rid of it in the latter? Sebastian From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bigeasy@linutronix.de (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior) Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 18:32:51 +0200 Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/4] tty: serial: 8250 core: add runtime pm In-Reply-To: <20140709151242.GY28884@atomide.com> References: <1404491651-1388-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <1404491651-1388-3-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20140707142056.46f61cf9@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> <20140709111705.GR28884@atomide.com> <53BD291D.3040307@linutronix.de> <20140709114837.GU28884@atomide.com> <53BD38D3.2000204@linutronix.de> <20140709151242.GY28884@atomide.com> Message-ID: <53BD6EB3.4020305@linutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/09/2014 05:12 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > And also please note that for runtime PM the wake-up events need > to be always enabled, so the device_may_wakeup() checks should > be only implemented for suspend and resume. I think I got that > corrected for most part in omap-serial.c recently, but knowing > that might reduce the confusion a bit :) Ehm. I also added it to omap_8250_pm() as it is done in omap-serial (in serial_omap_pm()). Should I get rid of it in the latter? Sebastian