From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] btrfs: remove unnecessary error check
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 10:35:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BF3F71.1010703@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53BE94C6.6000502@redhat.com>
Hi Eric,
(2014/07/10 22:27), Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 7/10/14, 1:44 AM, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
>> (2014/07/10 12:26), Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jul 9, 2014, at 10:20 PM, Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>>>
>>>> If "(!IS_ERR(trans) || PTR_ERR(trans) != -ENOSPC))" is false,
>>>> obviously "trans" is -ENOSPC. So we can safely remove the redundant
>>>> "(PTR_ERR(trans) == -ENOSPC)" check.
>>>>
>>>
>>> True, but now a comment like:
>>>
>>> /* Handle ENOSPC */
>>>
>>> might still be nice...
>>
>> Eric, thank you for your comment. I fixed my patch.
>> How about is it?
>
> One other thing I missed the first time, I'm sorry, notes below:
>
>>
>> ===
>> From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>
>> If "(!IS_ERR(trans) || PTR_ERR(trans) != -ENOSPC))" is false,
>> obviously "trans" is -ENOSPC. So we can safely remove the redundant
>> "(PTR_ERR(trans) == -ENOSPC)" check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>> index 3668048..115aac3 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>> @@ -3803,22 +3803,23 @@ static struct btrfs_trans_handle *__unlink_start_trans(struct inode *dir)
>> if (!IS_ERR(trans) || PTR_ERR(trans) != -ENOSPC)
>> return trans;
>>
>> - if (PTR_ERR(trans) == -ENOSPC) {
>> - u64 num_bytes = btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(root, 5);
>> + /* Handle ENOSPC */
>>
>> - trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
>> - if (IS_ERR(trans))
>> - return trans;
>> - ret = btrfs_cond_migrate_bytes(root->fs_info,
>> - &root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv,
>> - num_bytes, 5);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
>> - return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> - }
>> - trans->block_rsv = &root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv;
>> - trans->bytes_reserved = num_bytes;
>> + u64 num_bytes = btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(root, 5);
>
> This variable should be declared at the beginning of the function,
> not in the middle, because it's no longer in a separate code block.
OK, moved.
>
> Also, somehow by the time the patch got here, tabs turned into
> 4 spaces, so this one wouldn't apply for me.
I did't realize that. Thank you.
>
> Sorry for missing the variable declaration problem the first time!
No problem, more review is welcome. THank you very much :-)
This is the v3 patch.
===
From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
If "(!IS_ERR(trans) || PTR_ERR(trans) != -ENOSPC))" is false,
obviously "trans" is -ENOSPC. So we can safely remove the redundant
"(PTR_ERR(trans) == -ENOSPC)" check.
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 3668048..e7ac779 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -3790,6 +3790,7 @@ static struct btrfs_trans_handle *__unlink_start_trans(struct inode *dir)
{
struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(dir)->root;
+ u64 num_bytes = btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(root, 5);
int ret;
/*
@@ -3803,22 +3804,21 @@ static struct btrfs_trans_handle *__unlink_start_trans(struct inode *dir)
if (!IS_ERR(trans) || PTR_ERR(trans) != -ENOSPC)
return trans;
- if (PTR_ERR(trans) == -ENOSPC) {
- u64 num_bytes = btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(root, 5);
+ /* Handle ENOSPC */
- trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
- if (IS_ERR(trans))
- return trans;
- ret = btrfs_cond_migrate_bytes(root->fs_info,
- &root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv,
- num_bytes, 5);
- if (ret) {
- btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
- }
- trans->block_rsv = &root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv;
- trans->bytes_reserved = num_bytes;
+ trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(trans))
+ return trans;
+ ret = btrfs_cond_migrate_bytes(root->fs_info,
+ &root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv,
+ num_bytes, 5);
+ if (ret) {
+ btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
+ trans->block_rsv = &root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv;
+ trans->bytes_reserved = num_bytes;
+
return trans;
}
--
1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-11 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-10 3:19 [PATCH] btrfs: remove unnecessary error check Satoru Takeuchi
2014-07-10 3:26 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-07-10 6:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Satoru Takeuchi
2014-07-10 13:27 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-07-11 1:35 ` Satoru Takeuchi [this message]
2014-07-11 14:23 ` [PATCH v3] " Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53BF3F71.1010703@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.