From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: voice.shen@atmel.com (Bo Shen) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 18:17:14 +0800 Subject: [BUG] usb: gadget: rndis: atmel_usba_udc: probe of 500000.gadget failed with error -2 In-Reply-To: <53BFAEE4.3060009@aksignal.cz> References: <53BF8890.9020409@aksignal.cz> <53BF998B.2070006@atmel.com> <53BFAEE4.3060009@aksignal.cz> Message-ID: <53BFB9AA.5080404@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Jiri, On 07/11/2014 05:31 PM, Ji?? Prchal wrote: > > > Dne 11.7.2014 10:00, Bo Shen napsal(a): >> Hi Jiri Prchal, >> >> On 07/11/2014 02:47 PM, Ji?? Prchal wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I discovered bug when I try to use RNDIS gadget driver on SAM9G25 with >>> version 3.16.0-rc4. In version 3.14.0-rc4 it was OK. >>> If I plug pc to device port on my board I expect to establish ethernet >>> connection, instead of this it looks like it behave like host port. If I >>> look at all messages I found some problem during boot: >>> [ 1.585937] atmel_usba_udc: probe of 500000.gadget failed with >>> error -2 >> >> I tested OK with Linux kernel v3.16-rc4 (latest commit is: >> 4f440cd534359f689cb577c68f8491d1eddf0b76) on sam9g25. >> >> Best Regards, >> Bo Shen >> > I just cloned git > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git and > still same problem. There is some other commit. > Couldn't be the problem in at91sam9x5.dtsi not defines clocks? > In ohci they are: > usb0: ohci at 00600000 { > compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-ohci", "usb-ohci"; > reg = <0x00600000 0x100000>; > interrupts = <22 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 2>; > clocks = <&usb>, <&uhphs_clk>, <&udphs_clk>, > <&uhpck>; > clock-names = "usb_clk", "ohci_clk", "hclk", "uhpck"; > status = "disabled"; > }; > But in gadget not: > usb2: gadget at f803c000 { > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <0>; > compatible = "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc"; > reg = <0x00500000 0x80000 > 0xf803c000 0x400>; > interrupts = <23 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>; > status = "disabled"; Thanks for reporting it. Using at91_dt_defconfig won't reproduce this issue. However, only enable at91sam9x5 and CCF will reproduce this issue. I will send out the patch to fix it. Thanks again. > Best Regards, > Jiri Best Regards, Bo Shen