All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com (Sergei Shtylyov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3+1 5/5] ARM: DT: STi: STiH416: Add DT node for MiPHY365x
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 04:30:22 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C0819E.4000202@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140711115406.GB2954@lee--X1>

Hello.

On 07/11/2014 03:54 PM, Lee Jones wrote:

> The MiPHY365x is a Generic PHY which can serve various SATA or PCIe
> devices. It has 2 ports which it can use for either; both SATA, both
> PCIe or one of each in any configuration.

> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts
> index 4e2df66..c3c2ac6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts
> @@ -12,4 +12,16 @@
>   / {
>   	model = "STiH416 B2020";
>   	compatible = "st,stih416-b2020", "st,stih416";
> +
> +	soc {
> +		miphy365x_phy: miphy365x at fe382000 {
> +			phy_port0: port at fe382000 {

    I don't understand why are you creating the duplicate labels; doesn't 
'dtc' complain about them? You could instead refer to them as:

&miphy365x_phy {
};

> +				st,sata-gen = <3>;
> +			};
> +
> +			phy_port1: port at fe38a000 {
> +				st,pcie-tx-pol-inv;
> +			};
> +		};
> +	};
>   };
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416.dtsi
> index 84758d7..2b98a0a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416.dtsi
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
>   #include "stih41x.dtsi"
>   #include "stih416-clock.dtsi"
>   #include "stih416-pinctrl.dtsi"
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/phy/phy-miphy365x.h>
>   #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>   #include <dt-bindings/reset-controller/stih416-resets.h>
>   / {
> @@ -236,5 +238,25 @@
>   			resets	= <&powerdown STIH416_KEYSCAN_POWERDOWN>,
>   				  <&softreset STIH416_KEYSCAN_SOFTRESET>;
>   		};
> +
> +		miphy365x_phy: miphy365x at fe382000 {

    The ePAPR standard [1] says:

The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the 
device and not its precise programming model.

> +			compatible      = "st,miphy365x-phy";
> +			st,syscfg  	= <&syscfg_rear>;
> +			#address-cells	= <1>;
> +			#size-cells	= <1>;
> +			ranges;
> +
> +			phy_port0: port at fe382000 {
> +				#phy-cells = <1>;

    If these are PHY devices, they should be named "phy", not "port".

> +				reg = <0xfe382000 0x100>, <0xfe394000 0x100>, <0x824 0x4>;
> +				reg-names = "sata", "pcie", "syscfg";
> +			};
> +
> +			phy_port1: port at fe38a000 {
> +				#phy-cells = <1>;
> +				reg = <0xfe38a000 0x100>, <0xfe804000 0x100>, <0x828 0x4>;
> +				reg-names = "sata", "pcie", "syscfg";
> +			};
> +		};
>   	};
>   };

WBR, Sergei

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kishon@ti.com
Cc: kernel@stlinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3+1 5/5] ARM: DT: STi: STiH416: Add DT node for MiPHY365x
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 04:30:22 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C0819E.4000202@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140711115406.GB2954@lee--X1>

Hello.

On 07/11/2014 03:54 PM, Lee Jones wrote:

> The MiPHY365x is a Generic PHY which can serve various SATA or PCIe
> devices. It has 2 ports which it can use for either; both SATA, both
> PCIe or one of each in any configuration.

> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts
> index 4e2df66..c3c2ac6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416-b2020.dts
> @@ -12,4 +12,16 @@
>   / {
>   	model = "STiH416 B2020";
>   	compatible = "st,stih416-b2020", "st,stih416";
> +
> +	soc {
> +		miphy365x_phy: miphy365x@fe382000 {
> +			phy_port0: port@fe382000 {

    I don't understand why are you creating the duplicate labels; doesn't 
'dtc' complain about them? You could instead refer to them as:

&miphy365x_phy {
};

> +				st,sata-gen = <3>;
> +			};
> +
> +			phy_port1: port@fe38a000 {
> +				st,pcie-tx-pol-inv;
> +			};
> +		};
> +	};
>   };
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416.dtsi
> index 84758d7..2b98a0a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih416.dtsi
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
>   #include "stih41x.dtsi"
>   #include "stih416-clock.dtsi"
>   #include "stih416-pinctrl.dtsi"
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/phy/phy-miphy365x.h>
>   #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>   #include <dt-bindings/reset-controller/stih416-resets.h>
>   / {
> @@ -236,5 +238,25 @@
>   			resets	= <&powerdown STIH416_KEYSCAN_POWERDOWN>,
>   				  <&softreset STIH416_KEYSCAN_SOFTRESET>;
>   		};
> +
> +		miphy365x_phy: miphy365x@fe382000 {

    The ePAPR standard [1] says:

The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the 
device and not its precise programming model.

> +			compatible      = "st,miphy365x-phy";
> +			st,syscfg  	= <&syscfg_rear>;
> +			#address-cells	= <1>;
> +			#size-cells	= <1>;
> +			ranges;
> +
> +			phy_port0: port@fe382000 {
> +				#phy-cells = <1>;

    If these are PHY devices, they should be named "phy", not "port".

> +				reg = <0xfe382000 0x100>, <0xfe394000 0x100>, <0x824 0x4>;
> +				reg-names = "sata", "pcie", "syscfg";
> +			};
> +
> +			phy_port1: port@fe38a000 {
> +				#phy-cells = <1>;
> +				reg = <0xfe38a000 0x100>, <0xfe804000 0x100>, <0x828 0x4>;
> +				reg-names = "sata", "pcie", "syscfg";
> +			};
> +		};
>   	};
>   };

WBR, Sergei


  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-12  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-09 11:41 [PATCH v3 0/5] phy: miphy365x: Introduce support for MiPHY365x Lee Jones
2014-07-09 11:41 ` Lee Jones
2014-07-09 11:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] phy: miphy365x: Add Device Tree bindings for the MiPHY365x Lee Jones
2014-07-09 11:41   ` Lee Jones
2014-07-09 14:30   ` Gabriel Fernandez
2014-07-09 14:30     ` Gabriel Fernandez
2014-07-09 16:37     ` Lee Jones
2014-07-09 16:37       ` Lee Jones
2014-07-10  9:09   ` [PATCH v3+1 " Lee Jones
2014-07-10  9:09     ` Lee Jones
2014-07-09 11:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] phy: miphy365x: Add MiPHY365x header file for DT x Driver defines Lee Jones
2014-07-09 11:41   ` Lee Jones
2014-07-11  9:07   ` Gabriel Fernandez
2014-07-11  9:07     ` Gabriel Fernandez
2014-07-11  9:33     ` Lee Jones
2014-07-11  9:33       ` Lee Jones
2014-07-09 11:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] phy: miphy365x: Provide support for the MiPHY356x Generic PHY Lee Jones
2014-07-09 11:41   ` Lee Jones
2014-07-11  9:07   ` Gabriel Fernandez
2014-07-11  9:07     ` Gabriel Fernandez
2014-07-09 11:41 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] phy: miphy365x: Represent each PHY channel as a DT subnode Lee Jones
2014-07-09 11:41   ` Lee Jones
2014-07-09 11:41 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] ARM: DT: STi: STiH416: Add DT node for MiPHY365x Lee Jones
2014-07-09 11:41   ` Lee Jones
2014-07-11 11:54   ` [PATCH v3+1 " Lee Jones
2014-07-11 11:54     ` Lee Jones
2014-07-12  0:30     ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2014-07-12  0:30       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-07-14  7:58       ` Lee Jones
2014-07-14  7:58         ` Lee Jones
2014-07-20 17:56         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-07-20 17:56           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-07-22  9:02     ` [STLinux Kernel] " Maxime Coquelin
2014-07-22  9:02       ` Maxime Coquelin
2014-07-09 14:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] phy: miphy365x: Introduce support " Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-09 14:52   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-10 15:35   ` [STLinux Kernel] " Peter Griffin
2014-07-10 15:35     ` Peter Griffin
2014-07-11 10:31     ` Lee Jones
2014-07-11 10:31       ` Lee Jones
2014-07-11 11:05       ` Peter Griffin
2014-07-11 11:05         ` Peter Griffin
2014-07-11 11:13         ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-11 11:13           ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-11 11:34           ` Lee Jones
2014-07-11 11:34             ` Lee Jones
2014-07-11 11:30         ` Lee Jones
2014-07-11 11:30           ` Lee Jones
2014-07-11 11:33           ` Maxime Coquelin
2014-07-11 11:33             ` Maxime Coquelin
2014-07-11 11:38             ` Lee Jones
2014-07-11 11:38               ` Lee Jones
     [not found] ` <20140721062805.GA8781@uda0393678>
2014-07-21  7:39   ` Lee Jones
2014-07-22  7:23     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-22  7:28       ` [STLinux Kernel] " Maxime Coquelin
2014-07-23  7:58       ` Maxime Coquelin
2014-07-23  8:24         ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53C0819E.4000202@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.