From: sdu.liu@huawei.com (Liu hua)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] irqchip: GIC: check and clear GIC interupt active status
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:22:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C34CF2.5050209@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140711123507.GE12899@arm.com>
On 2014/7/11 20:35, Will Deacon wrote:
> [adding Marc]
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 07:46:15AM +0100, Liu Hua wrote:
>> For this version of GIC codes, kernel assumes that all the interrupt
>> status of GIC is inactive. So the kernel does not check this when
>> booting.
>>
>> This is no problem on must sitations. But when kdump is deplayed.
>> And a panic occurs when a interrupt is being handled (may be PPI
>> and SPI). We have no chance to write relative bit to GICC_EOIR.
>> So this interrupt remains active. And GIC will not deliver this
>> type interrupt to cpu interface. And the capture kernel may
>> fail to boot becase of lacking of certain interrupt (such as timer
>> interupt).
>>
>>
>> I glanced over the GIC Architecture Specification, but did not
>> find a simple way to deactive state of all interrupts. For GICv1,
>> I can only deal with one abnormal interrupt state one time. For
>> GICv2, I can deactive 32 one time.
>>
>>
>> So guys, Do you know a better way to do that?
>
> What happens if, in the crash kernel, you disable the CPU interfaces
> (GICC_CTLR.ENABLE) then disable the distributor (GICD_CTLR.ENABLE) before
> enabling everything again in the reverse order? Is that enough to cause the
> GIC to drop any active states? It's not clear to me from a quick look at
> the TRM.
>
Hi Will,
Thanks for your reply!
I did what you said at the beginning of "gic_dist_init". The active states
remained (panic in local timer interrupt (PPI))and the kernel failed to boot,
Did I do that at wrong place?
-------------------
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index b6b0a81..94d6352 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -454,6 +455,7 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
void __iomem *base = gic_data_dist_base(gic);
void __iomem *cpu_base = gic_data_cpu_base(gic);
+ writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
/*
------------------------
As shown in GIC Architecture Specification manual,I think that the GICC_CTLR.ENABLE
and GICD_CTLR.ENABLE only control the delivering of the interrupt, not the active
states.
As GIC manual says "For every read of a valid Interrupt ID from the GICC_IAR, the
connected processor must perform a matching write to the GICC_EOIR". So we should
find a way to drop the active states when booting, if we do not remain these active
states by design.
Thanks,
Liu Hua
> Will
>
> .
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Liu hua <sdu.liu@huawei.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"jason@lakedaemon.net" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
"nicolas.pitre@linaro.org" <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"ebiederm@xmission.com" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"wangnan0@huawei.com" <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
"liuxueliu.liu@huawei.com" <liuxueliu.liu@huawei.com>,
"peifeiyue@huawei.com" <peifeiyue@huawei.com>,
"liusdu@126.com" <liusdu@126.com>, <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] irqchip: GIC: check and clear GIC interupt active status
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:22:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C34CF2.5050209@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140711123507.GE12899@arm.com>
On 2014/7/11 20:35, Will Deacon wrote:
> [adding Marc]
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 07:46:15AM +0100, Liu Hua wrote:
>> For this version of GIC codes, kernel assumes that all the interrupt
>> status of GIC is inactive. So the kernel does not check this when
>> booting.
>>
>> This is no problem on must sitations. But when kdump is deplayed.
>> And a panic occurs when a interrupt is being handled (may be PPI
>> and SPI). We have no chance to write relative bit to GICC_EOIR.
>> So this interrupt remains active. And GIC will not deliver this
>> type interrupt to cpu interface. And the capture kernel may
>> fail to boot becase of lacking of certain interrupt (such as timer
>> interupt).
>>
>>
>> I glanced over the GIC Architecture Specification, but did not
>> find a simple way to deactive state of all interrupts. For GICv1,
>> I can only deal with one abnormal interrupt state one time. For
>> GICv2, I can deactive 32 one time.
>>
>>
>> So guys, Do you know a better way to do that?
>
> What happens if, in the crash kernel, you disable the CPU interfaces
> (GICC_CTLR.ENABLE) then disable the distributor (GICD_CTLR.ENABLE) before
> enabling everything again in the reverse order? Is that enough to cause the
> GIC to drop any active states? It's not clear to me from a quick look at
> the TRM.
>
Hi Will,
Thanks for your reply!
I did what you said at the beginning of "gic_dist_init". The active states
remained (panic in local timer interrupt (PPI))and the kernel failed to boot,
Did I do that at wrong place?
-------------------
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index b6b0a81..94d6352 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -454,6 +455,7 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
void __iomem *base = gic_data_dist_base(gic);
void __iomem *cpu_base = gic_data_cpu_base(gic);
+ writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
/*
------------------------
As shown in GIC Architecture Specification manual,I think that the GICC_CTLR.ENABLE
and GICD_CTLR.ENABLE only control the delivering of the interrupt, not the active
states.
As GIC manual says "For every read of a valid Interrupt ID from the GICC_IAR, the
connected processor must perform a matching write to the GICC_EOIR". So we should
find a way to drop the active states when booting, if we do not remain these active
states by design.
Thanks,
Liu Hua
> Will
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-14 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-11 6:46 [RFC PATCH 0/2] irqchip: GIC: check and clear GIC interupt active status Liu Hua
2014-07-11 6:46 ` Liu Hua
2014-07-11 6:46 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] irqchip: GIC: introduce ICPIDR2 register interface Liu Hua
2014-07-11 6:46 ` Liu Hua
2014-07-11 6:46 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] irqchip: GIC: introduce method to deactive interupts Liu Hua
2014-07-11 6:46 ` Liu Hua
2014-07-11 12:35 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] irqchip: GIC: check and clear GIC interupt active status Will Deacon
2014-07-11 12:35 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-14 3:22 ` Liu hua [this message]
2014-07-14 3:22 ` Liu hua
2014-07-14 9:57 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-14 9:57 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C34CF2.5050209@huawei.com \
--to=sdu.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.