From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48185) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6gvb-0002vR-Cb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:08:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6gvT-0008V9-Qp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:08:27 -0400 Message-ID: <53C3E43C.7010206@ilande.co.uk> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 15:07:56 +0100 From: Mark Cave-Ayland MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1405268253-33465-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <53C3E216.8040903@ilande.co.uk> <53C3E27F.1030204@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <53C3E27F.1030204@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] PPC: Mac99 emulation fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org Cc: programmingkidx@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 14/07/14 15:00, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 14.07.14 15:58, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: >> On 13/07/14 17:17, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >>> While trying to get Mac OS X booting with our -M mac99 emulation I >>> stumbled >>> over a few issues that prevented it from doing so. >>> >>> With these patches applied I still can't properly boot Mac OS X with >>> -M mac99, >>> but I get a lot further than before. The biggest issue that's left >>> now is to >>> properly fake Mac OS X into believing our timebase frequency. If I >>> hack up the >>> cuda timer I can successfully boot Mac OS X on mac99: >> >> No complaints from me on this series (I see Paolo has already >> commented suggested some MemoryRegion changes). Is this part of a >> bug-fix series to fix a -M mac99 regression on KVM or is it 2.2 material? > > Mac99 never really worked for me, so I think this can easily be 2.2 > material. Maybe we can get the PCI bus working during the 2.2 > development time frame too then. > > I mostly CC'ed you for the NVRAM patch, as that depends on an OpenBIOS > change :). Yup, saw that commit go into SVN trunk. Okay so no need to worry about re-running my OpenBIOS boot tests before the 2.1 release then :) ATB, Mark.