From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
To: Chase Southwood <chase.southwood@gmail.com>
Cc: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<hsweeten@visionengravers.com>,
"devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: comedi: addi_apci_1564: use addi_watchdog module to init watchdog subdevice
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:14:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C4FF1B.3080409@mev.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+jnaaVm9_S1=aVCoq_corBvUHDDz2LC3zSLD_D2PsSbGy_avg@mail.gmail.com>
On 2014-07-15 05:00, Chase Southwood wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 2014-07-12 23:44, Chase Southwood wrote:
>>>
>>> Use the addi_watchdog module to provide support for the watchdog
>>> subdevice.
>>>
>>> Also, rearrange the subdevice init blocks so that the order makes sense.
>>> Digital input/output subdevices and subdevices for DI/DO interrupt
>>> support, followed by timer/counter/watchdog subdevices is the new order.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chase Southwood <chase.southwood@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
>>> Cc: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_1564.c | 34
>>> +++++++++++++++----------
>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> I don't think the subdevice order matters that much, and I prefer to keep
>> them stable, but since this driver is in such a state of flux, it doesn't
>> really matter.
>>
>
> Hi Ian!
> Quick question here about this. First off, duly noted that grouping
> subdevices by function isn't necessary and I won't shuffle them around
> like this in the future. Second, the reason I stuck the watchdog at
> the end is because it causes an early return if addi_watchdog_init()
> returns an error and it seemed appropriate at the end so it doesn't
> prevent the initialization of any other subdevices if that call should
> fail. Now I realize that it is very unlikely that that call fails,
> but in any case should I put future subdevice inits above the watchdog
> for the same reason (so they aren't at risk of not getting
> initialized), or does that count for subdevice order not being stable
> and you would prefer them all to go at the end?
Since you return an error from the auto_attach handler
apci1564_auto_attach() when addi_watchdog_init() fails, it makes little
difference what order the subdevices are initialized in. The error from
auto_attach handler causes the comedi core to call the detach handler
apci1564_detach() and tear everything down. Ultimately,
comedi_pci_auto_attach() will return an error back to the PCI probe
function apci1564_pci_probe(), which will propagate it to the PCI subsystem.
In general, if adding a new subdevice, either add it to the end or
replace an "unused" subdevice.
--
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbotti@mev.co.uk> )=-
-=( Tel: +44 (0)161 477 1898 FAX: +44 (0)161 718 3587 )=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-15 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-12 22:42 [PATCH 1/2] staging: comedi: addi_apci_1564: driver no longer needs to include addi_common.h Chase Southwood
2014-07-12 22:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging: comedi: addi_apci_1564: use addi_watchdog module to init watchdog subdevice Chase Southwood
2014-07-13 19:17 ` Hartley Sweeten
2014-07-14 3:09 ` Chase Southwood
2014-07-14 9:22 ` Ian Abbott
2014-07-15 4:00 ` Chase Southwood
2014-07-15 10:14 ` Ian Abbott [this message]
2014-07-17 2:35 ` Chase Southwood
2014-07-14 9:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: comedi: addi_apci_1564: driver no longer needs to include addi_common.h Ian Abbott
2014-07-14 9:23 ` Ian Abbott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C4FF1B.3080409@mev.co.uk \
--to=abbotti@mev.co.uk \
--cc=chase.southwood@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hsweeten@visionengravers.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.