From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Lutz Subject: Re: Question on Active Directory Authentication Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:43:26 +0200 Message-ID: <53C62D1E.1050407@muenchen.de> References: <53B6A3ED.9060805@muenchen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: Tobias Doerffel , "linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Hi Tobias, this was the intention of my question because with other security=20 options it didn't work but we were searching for a method to so without= =20 kerberos. In our deployment I would suggest to use kerberos but it's no= t=20 easy to deploy a working configuration to 15.000 Linux Clients within=20 days (which is the actual problem). Thanks for your hints. Regards Christian Am 09.07.2014 13:13, schrieb Tobias Doerffel: > Hi Christian, > > I never used the NTLM security options but I would guess that they wo= uldn't work that way as they still require usernames and passwords. Krb= 5 is the only security method where you can use an existing credential = information in form of a Kerberos ticket. > > Best regards > > Tobias Doerffel > > > -- > Dipl.-Inf. Tobias Doerffel > > ----------------------------------------------- > EDC Electronic Design Chemnitz GmbH > Technologie-Campus 4, 09126 Chemnitz > > Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Dr.-Ing. Steffen Heinz > Dipl.-Ing. Andr=E9 Lange > Tel.: +49 371 52 45 90 > Fax.: +49 371 52 45 910 > E-Mail: info-2LT3hlbiLj/X2ID+q72mRQ@public.gmane.org > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Chemnitz > HRB 23986, Amtsgericht Chemnitz > USTID: DE258181725 > ----------------------------------------------- > >