All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hujianyang <hujianyang@huawei.com>
To: <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: ubifs error at boot "bad node type"
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:06:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C66ACD.5090508@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405499347.1906.2.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>

On 2014/7/16 16:29, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 12:10 +0200, Richard Genoud wrote:
>> ubiattach is ok:
>> # ubiattach -m 3
>> [   50.164062] UBI: default fastmap pool size: 95
>> [   50.164062] UBI: default fastmap WL pool size: 25
> 
> I do not know why this happened, I never saw reports like this before.
> Most probably this is because of fastmap. I did not hear any report that
> it was extensively verified WRT power cuts, and my theory is that there
> is a bug in fastmap which causes this, and this may be related to power
> cuts. I do not have proves, but suggest you to dig in this direction.
> E.g., setup power-cut testing.
> 

My colleague who use UBIFS with kernel v2.6.34(WR4?) hit
an error like this:

UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_read_node: bad node type (255 but expected 0)
UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_read_node: bad node at LEB 112:67824, LEB mapping status 1
UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_iget: failed to read inode 1, error -22

He said he was running UBIFS for 3 years and would hit this
error about one time per year.

I googled these error messages and found some same reports
in 2010~2012. So I think this problem is fixed by early
fixes, I asked him to backport this patch set

[PATCH 00/13] UBI reliability improvements

but I'm sure of that. After this error report, I was
worrying about this bug still left.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-16 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-08 10:10 ubifs error at boot "bad node type" Richard Genoud
2014-07-09  0:51 ` hujianyang
2014-07-09  7:23   ` Richard Genoud
2014-07-16  8:29 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-07-16 12:02   ` Richard Weinberger
2014-07-16 12:26     ` Richard Genoud
2014-07-16 12:32       ` Richard Weinberger
2014-07-16 14:39         ` Richard Genoud
2014-07-16 12:33       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-07-16 12:49         ` Richard Weinberger
2014-07-16 12:06   ` hujianyang [this message]
2014-07-16 12:17 ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53C66ACD.5090508@huawei.com \
    --to=hujianyang@huawei.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard.genoud@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.