From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:56:00 +0200 Message-ID: <53C67660.8050003@samsung.com> References: <1404496099-26708-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> <1404496099-26708-19-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> <1405504062.4408.11.camel@x220> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:41876 "EHLO mailout1.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933666AbaGPM4k (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:56:40 -0400 In-reply-to: <1405504062.4408.11.camel@x220> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Bolle Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , Marek Szyprowski , Mark Brown , =?UTF-8?B?SGVpa28gU3TDvGJuZXI=?= , Tomasz Figa On 16.07.2014 11:47, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 19:48 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: [snip] >> config SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA >> int "Number of additional GPIO pins" >> default 128 if SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA128 > > So a second order effect is that SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA can now be removed. > Which implies that SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA64 and SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA128 can > also be removed. > > Should I submit the trivial patch to do that or is a patch already > queued somewhere? Please do if you don't mind. That's one more thing I missed. Best regards, Tomasz From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:56:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 18/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove remaining legacy code In-Reply-To: <1405504062.4408.11.camel@x220> References: <1404496099-26708-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> <1404496099-26708-19-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> <1405504062.4408.11.camel@x220> Message-ID: <53C67660.8050003@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 16.07.2014 11:47, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 19:48 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: [snip] >> config SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA >> int "Number of additional GPIO pins" >> default 128 if SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA128 > > So a second order effect is that SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA can now be removed. > Which implies that SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA64 and SAMSUNG_GPIO_EXTRA128 can > also be removed. > > Should I submit the trivial patch to do that or is a patch already > queued somewhere? Please do if you don't mind. That's one more thing I missed. Best regards, Tomasz