All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael Tokarev" <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
	"Aurélien Jarno" <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] How to handle feature regressions in new QEMU releases
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:11:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C6B24D.4020403@weilnetz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53C6AD18.8030102@redhat.com>

Am 16.07.2014 18:49, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 16/07/2014 18:28, Stefan Weil ha scritto:
>> Debian testing includes a brand new libiscsi, but it
>> does not include libiscsi.pc, so pkg-config won't know that it is
>> available and configure will disable libiscsi.
> 
> That's a packaging bug.

CC'ing Michael as he is the Debian maintainer of this package and
Aurélien who maintains QEMU for Debian.

Michael, should I send a Debian bug report for libiscsi-dev? Would an
update of libiscsi for Debian stable be reasonable if versions older
than 1.9 are too buggy to be used? I must admit that I'm a little bit
surprised because iSCSI support worked for me quite well the last time I
used it with Debian wheezy.

Regards
Stefan

> 
>> I have a patch which
>> fixes this, so QEMU for Debian testing could include libiscsi again.
>>
>> Is a feature regression like this one acceptable? Do we need additional
>> testing (maybe run the build bots with --enable-xxx, so builds fail when
>> xxx no longer works)?
> 
> As mentioned in the e49ab19fcaa617ad6cdfe1ac401327326b6a2552 commit
> message, this was intentional.  I was reluctant to do it, but ultimately
> Peter Lieven convinced me that it isn't just about using fancy new APIs;
> libiscsi was too buggy to be useful until release 1.8.0 (even 1.9.0
> requires a patch to avoid segfaults, and many more if you want to run it
> on ARM).
> 
> Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-16 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-16  0:26 [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] QEMU 2.1.0-rc2 is now available Michael Roth
2014-07-16 16:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC] How to handle feature regressions in new QEMU releases (was: [ANNOUNCE] QEMU 2.1.0-rc2 is now available) Stefan Weil
2014-07-16 16:46   ` Peter Maydell
2014-07-16 17:37     ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC] How to handle feature regressions in new QEMU releases Peter Lieven
2014-07-16 16:49   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-16 17:11     ` Stefan Weil [this message]
2014-07-16 17:23       ` ronnie sahlberg
2014-07-16 17:29         ` Michael Tokarev
2014-07-24  0:37           ` ronnie sahlberg
2014-07-24 10:10             ` Michael Tokarev
2014-07-16 17:36         ` Peter Lieven
2014-07-16 17:28       ` Michael Tokarev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53C6B24D.4020403@weilnetz.de \
    --to=sw@weilnetz.de \
    --cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
    --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=pl@kamp.de \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.