From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean up ACPI core to prepare for running ACPI on ARM64 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:39:41 -0700 Message-ID: <53C70D3D.8080605@zytor.com> References: <1404898746-6685-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <2351210.nfpIXXiZXh@vostro.rjw.lan> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3285FA2B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:47087 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752969AbaGPXkW (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:40:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3285FA2B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Luck, Tony" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Thomas Gleixner , 'Ingo Molnar' Cc: Hanjun Guo , Catalin Marinas , Graeme Gregory , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" , "x86@kernel.org" On 07/16/2014 04:28 PM, Luck, Tony wrote: >> Are there any objections against this series from the x86 and ia64 maintainers? > > I'll believe the claim of no functional changes for ia64 ... so no objections from me. > > -Tony > No objection here, modulo the issue I just flagged (which is IA64-related, not x86, so Tony is the one who actually needs to decide it.) -hpa From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:39:41 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] Clean up ACPI core to prepare for running ACPI on ARM64 In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3285FA2B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1404898746-6685-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <2351210.nfpIXXiZXh@vostro.rjw.lan> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3285FA2B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> Message-ID: <53C70D3D.8080605@zytor.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/16/2014 04:28 PM, Luck, Tony wrote: >> Are there any objections against this series from the x86 and ia64 maintainers? > > I'll believe the claim of no functional changes for ia64 ... so no objections from me. > > -Tony > No objection here, modulo the issue I just flagged (which is IA64-related, not x86, so Tony is the one who actually needs to decide it.) -hpa