From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 2A579E00777; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 05:46:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from sanddollar.geekisp.com (sanddollar.geekisp.com [216.168.135.167]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C13DFE006B9 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 05:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 958 invoked by uid 1003); 17 Jul 2014 12:46:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.122?) (philip@opensdr.com@71.171.49.245) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 17 Jul 2014 12:46:25 -0000 Message-ID: <53C7C5A0.60201@balister.org> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 08:46:24 -0400 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: maciej.borzecki@open-rnd.pl, yocto@yoctoproject.org References: <1405599916.4781.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1405599916.4781.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Subject: Re: wic status X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:46:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/17/2014 08:25 AM, Maciek Borzecki wrote: > Hi, > > There used to be an entry about wic in development manual back in 1.5.2: > http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.5.2/dev-manual/dev-manual.html I'm not sure where the docs are, but people are responding to bug reports about wic with patches :) https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6513 Philip > > This entry is gone in current documentation and there seems to be no > mention of wic at all: > https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/dev-manual/dev-manual.html > > Does this mean that wic is deprecated? If so what is the current method > of creating partitioned images? > > I'm a bit confused as it seems meta-raspberrypi keeps maitaining > sdcard_image-rpi.bbclass, Freescale has their image_types_fsl.bbclass. > In meta-ti, there was this commit: > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/commit/?id=2b524321a25c35c5f987b8331e41b49d3b2e2d2b that effectively removed sdclass_image.bbclass, indicating that wic is the new way. >