From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"open list:READ-COPY UPDATE..." <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Check for have_rcu_nocb_mask instead of rcu_nocb_mask
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:11:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C86615.3040107@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140717234920.GD8690@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 07/17/2014 07:49 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:30:11PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> This is something similar to what you found yesterday with tick_nohz_full mask.
>>
>> --
>> Pranith
>>
>> If we configure a kernel with CONFIG_NOCB_CPU=y, CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE=y and
>> CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n and do not pass in a rcu_nocb= boot parameter, the
>> cpumask rcu_nocb_mask can be garbage instead of NULL.
>>
>> Hence this commit replaces checks for rcu_nocb_mask == NULL with a check for
>> have_rcu_nocb_mask.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
>
> Good catch! Could you please forward-port this to current rcu/dev?
> This now includes the fix you mentioned above, which generates conflicts.
>
> Could you please also fix the use in rcu_is_nocb_cpu()?
>
> And please see the comment below.
>
Please find the fixed patch.
--
Pranith
From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:02:54 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Feedback comments
If we configure a kernel with CONFIG_NOCB_CPU=y, CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE=y and
CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n and do not pass in a rcu_nocb= boot parameter, the
cpumask rcu_nocb_mask can be garbage instead of NULL.
Hence this commit replaces checks for rcu_nocb_mask == NULL with a check for
have_rcu_nocb_mask.
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index ce8c331..8f987c1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -2053,9 +2053,10 @@ static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp)
/* Is the specified CPU a no-CBs CPU? */
bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu)
{
- if (have_rcu_nocb_mask)
- return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
- return false;
+ if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask)
+ return false;
+
+ return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
}
#endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL */
@@ -2540,7 +2541,7 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
struct rcu_data *rdp_leader = NULL; /* Suppress misguided gcc warn. */
struct rcu_data *rdp_prev = NULL;
- if (rcu_nocb_mask == NULL)
+ if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask)
return;
#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) && !defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL)
if (tick_nohz_full_running)
@@ -2574,9 +2575,9 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
/* Prevent __call_rcu() from enqueuing callbacks on no-CBs CPUs */
static bool init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
- if (rcu_nocb_mask == NULL ||
- !cpumask_test_cpu(rdp->cpu, rcu_nocb_mask))
+ if (!rcu_is_nocb_cpu(rdp->cpu))
return false;
+
rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = NULL;
return true;
}
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-18 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-17 21:30 [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Check for have_rcu_nocb_mask instead of rcu_nocb_mask Pranith Kumar
2014-07-17 23:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-18 0:11 ` Pranith Kumar [this message]
2014-07-19 6:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-19 6:32 ` Pranith Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C86615.3040107@gmail.com \
--to=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.