From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Nathan Lynch <Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com>,
"linux390@de.ibm.com" <linux390@de.ibm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@t>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64,ia64,ppc,s390,sh,tile,um,x86,mm: Remove default gate area
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:36:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C96946.4090304@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXve-=N5yzqDw2YQee4BmC6sb8GYWYJcV2780V38OuJiQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/18/2014 09:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> Splitting this will be annoying: I'd probably have to add a flag asking for
> the new behavior, update all the arches, then remove the flag. The chance
> of screwing up bisectability in the process seems pretty high. This seems
> like overkill for a patch that mostly deletes code.
>
> Akpm, can you take this?
>
I'm fine with it as-is.
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Nathan Lynch <Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
"linux390@de.ibm.com" <linux390@de.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64, ia64, ppc, s390, sh, tile, um, x86, mm: Remove default gate area
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:36:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C96946.4090304@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXve-=N5yzqDw2YQee4BmC6sb8GYWYJcV2780V38OuJiQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/18/2014 09:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> Splitting this will be annoying: I'd probably have to add a flag asking for
> the new behavior, update all the arches, then remove the flag. The chance
> of screwing up bisectability in the process seems pretty high. This seems
> like overkill for a patch that mostly deletes code.
>
> Akpm, can you take this?
>
I'm fine with it as-is.
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Nathan Lynch <Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
"linux390@de.ibm.com" <linux390@de.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64, ia64, ppc, s390, sh, tile, um, x86, mm: Remove default gate area
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:36:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C96946.4090304@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXve-=N5yzqDw2YQee4BmC6sb8GYWYJcV2780V38OuJiQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/18/2014 09:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> Splitting this will be annoying: I'd probably have to add a flag asking for
> the new behavior, update all the arches, then remove the flag. The chance
> of screwing up bisectability in the process seems pretty high. This seems
> like overkill for a patch that mostly deletes code.
>
> Akpm, can you take this?
>
I'm fine with it as-is.
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] arm64, ia64, ppc, s390, sh, tile, um, x86, mm: Remove default gate area
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:36:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C96946.4090304@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXve-=N5yzqDw2YQee4BmC6sb8GYWYJcV2780V38OuJiQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/18/2014 09:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> Splitting this will be annoying: I'd probably have to add a flag asking for
> the new behavior, update all the arches, then remove the flag. The chance
> of screwing up bisectability in the process seems pretty high. This seems
> like overkill for a patch that mostly deletes code.
>
> Akpm, can you take this?
>
I'm fine with it as-is.
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Nathan Lynch <Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com>,
"linux390@de.ibm.com" <linux390@de.ibm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
"user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64,ia64,ppc,s390,sh,tile,um,x86,mm: Remove default gate area
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:36:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C96946.4090304@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXve-=N5yzqDw2YQee4BmC6sb8GYWYJcV2780V38OuJiQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/18/2014 09:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> Splitting this will be annoying: I'd probably have to add a flag asking for
> the new behavior, update all the arches, then remove the flag. The chance
> of screwing up bisectability in the process seems pretty high. This seems
> like overkill for a patch that mostly deletes code.
>
> Akpm, can you take this?
>
I'm fine with it as-is.
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-18 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-13 20:01 [PATCH v3] arm64,ia64,ppc,s390,sh,tile,um,x86,mm: Remove default gate area Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-13 20:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-13 20:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-13 20:01 ` [PATCH v3] arm64, ia64, ppc, s390, sh, tile, um, x86, mm: " Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-13 20:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-13 20:01 ` [PATCH v3] arm64,ia64,ppc,s390,sh,tile,um,x86,mm: " Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-13 20:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-13 20:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-15 14:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-15 14:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-15 14:47 ` [PATCH v3] arm64, ia64, ppc, s390, sh, tile, um, x86, mm: " Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-15 14:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-15 14:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-18 10:14 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-18 10:14 ` [PATCH v3] arm64,ia64,ppc,s390,sh,tile,um,x86,mm: " Will Deacon
2014-07-18 10:14 ` [PATCH v3] arm64, ia64, ppc, s390, sh, tile, um, x86, mm: " Will Deacon
2014-07-18 10:14 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-18 10:14 ` Will Deacon
2014-07-18 10:20 ` [PATCH v3] arm64,ia64,ppc,s390,sh,tile,um,x86,mm: " Richard Weinberger
2014-07-18 10:20 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-07-18 10:20 ` [PATCH v3] arm64, ia64, ppc, s390, sh, tile, um, x86, mm: " Richard Weinberger
2014-07-18 10:20 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-07-18 10:20 ` Richard Weinberger
2014-07-18 16:53 ` [PATCH v3] arm64,ia64,ppc,s390,sh,tile,um,x86,mm: " Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-18 16:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-18 16:53 ` [PATCH v3] arm64, ia64, ppc, s390, sh, tile, um, x86, mm: " Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-18 16:53 ` [uml-devel] " Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-18 17:28 ` [PATCH v3] arm64,ia64,ppc,s390,sh,tile,um,x86,mm: " Nathan Lynch
2014-07-18 17:28 ` Nathan Lynch
2014-07-18 17:28 ` [PATCH v3] arm64, ia64, ppc, s390, sh, tile, um, x86, mm: " Nathan Lynch
2014-07-18 17:28 ` Nathan Lynch
2014-07-18 17:28 ` Nathan Lynch
2014-07-18 18:36 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2014-07-18 18:36 ` [PATCH v3] arm64,ia64,ppc,s390,sh,tile,um,x86,mm: " H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-18 18:36 ` [PATCH v3] arm64, ia64, ppc, s390, sh, tile, um, x86, mm: " H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-18 18:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-18 18:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C96946.4090304@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cmetcalf@t \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.