From: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fast-import: use hashcmp() for SHA1 hash comparison
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 21:14:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C971FD.6040500@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140718184246.GS12427@google.com>
Am 18.07.2014 20:42, schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> René Scharfe wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
>> ---
>> fast-import.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Before:
>
> $ size git-fast-import
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 804138 6768 754160 1565066 17e18a git-fast-import
>
> After:
>
> $ size git-fast-import
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 804154 6768 754160 1565082 17e19a git-fast-import
>
> So this makes the text size worse on this machine (amd64, building
> with gcc 4.8.2 -O2). That's probably because the old code does 'call
> memcmp', while the new code inlines it. Inlining is presumably the
> better choice.
>
> More importantly, the new code is more readable.
Yes, the latter point is the important one.
If inlining is really better is another matter; I don't understand how
1a812f3a (hashcmp(): inline memcmp() by hand to optimize) could have
made git gc 18% faster, as it claimed. I would expect memcmp(), which
can compare more than a byte at a time, to be significantly faster -- or
at least just as fast as whatever the compiler does with the inlined
version.
René
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-18 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-18 16:00 [PATCH] fast-import: use hashcmp() for SHA1 hash comparison René Scharfe
2014-07-18 18:42 ` Jonathan Nieder
2014-07-18 19:14 ` René Scharfe [this message]
2014-07-18 23:57 ` Jeff King
2014-07-19 12:11 ` René Scharfe
2014-07-19 16:43 ` brian m. carlson
2014-07-19 17:53 ` René Scharfe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C971FD.6040500@web.de \
--to=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.