Re: [PATCH 00/11] intel_pstate updates

[Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>]

On 19/07/2014 11:31 μμ, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, July 18, 2014 08:37:16 AM dirk.brandewie@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com>
>>
>> These patches have been in the development branch used by Stratos,
>> Doug and myself for a long time.  I had hoped to batch them up with
>> other functional changes that are under development but those changes
>> are still under active discussion and there is no reason to hold these
>> changes up.
>>
>> Based on v3.16-rc5 commit 1795cd9b3a91d4b5473c97f491d63892442212ab
>>
>> Stratos Karafotis (11):
>>   cpufreq: intel_pstate: Make intel_pstate_kobject and debugfs_parent
>>     locals
>>   cpufreq: intel_pstate: Remove unnecessary type casting in div_s64()
>>     call
>>   cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add missing blank lines after declarations
>>   cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fit code in a single line where possible
>>   cpufreq: intel_pstate: Cleanup parentheses
>>   cpufreq: intel_pstate: Remove unnecessary intermediate variable
>>     sample_time
>>   cpufreq: intel_pstate: Align multiple lines to open parenthesis
>>   cpufreq: intel_pstate: Disable interrupts during MSRs reading
>>   cpufreq: intel_pstate: Simplify P state adjustment logic.
>>   cpufreq: intel_pstate: Remove core_pct rounding
>>   cpufreq: intel_pstate: Keep values in aperf/mperf in full precision
> 
> [11/11] appears to be the same as the patch marked [9/17] which I guess
> was posted by mistake.  Other than that, looks good.  Queued up for 3.17,
> thanks!

The only difference between them is the last 2 lines in changelog.
[11/11] is the correct one.
The final code in bleeding-edge is, of course, correct.

I'm sorry that I didn't notice this earlier.

Stratos