From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] iio: buffer: Coalesce adjacent demux table entries
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 16:14:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53CBDCE1.6020403@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405612789-27964-4-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de>
On 17/07/14 16:59, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> When copying multiple multiple samples that are adjacent in both the source as
> well as the destination buffer, instead of creating a new demux table entry for
> each sample just increase the length of the previous entry by the size of the
> new sample. This makes the demuxing process slightly more efficient.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Nice. Will hold these last two until the first one is in and we have decided
what to do about the second one.
J
> ---
> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index 5063703..779e5b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -942,13 +942,34 @@ int iio_push_to_buffers(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, const void *data)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_push_to_buffers);
>
> +static int iio_buffer_add_demux(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> + struct iio_demux_table **p, unsigned int in_loc, unsigned int out_loc,
> + unsigned int length)
> +{
> +
> + if (*p && (*p)->from + (*p)->length == in_loc &&
> + (*p)->to + (*p)->length == out_loc) {
> + (*p)->length += length;
> + } else {
> + *p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (*p == NULL)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + (*p)->from = in_loc;
> + (*p)->to = out_loc;
> + (*p)->length = length;
> + list_add_tail(&(*p)->l, &buffer->demux_list);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int iio_buffer_update_demux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> {
> const struct iio_chan_spec *ch;
> int ret, in_ind = -1, out_ind, length;
> unsigned in_loc = 0, out_loc = 0;
> - struct iio_demux_table *p;
> + struct iio_demux_table *p = NULL;
>
> /* Clear out any old demux */
> iio_buffer_demux_free(buffer);
> @@ -981,11 +1002,6 @@ static int iio_buffer_update_demux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> /* Make sure we are aligned */
> in_loc = roundup(in_loc, length) + length;
> }
> - p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (p == NULL) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto error_clear_mux_table;
> - }
> ch = iio_find_channel_from_si(indio_dev, in_ind);
> if (ch->scan_type.repeat > 1)
> length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8 *
> @@ -994,20 +1010,14 @@ static int iio_buffer_update_demux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8;
> out_loc = roundup(out_loc, length);
> in_loc = roundup(in_loc, length);
> - p->from = in_loc;
> - p->to = out_loc;
> - p->length = length;
> - list_add_tail(&p->l, &buffer->demux_list);
> + ret = iio_buffer_add_demux(buffer, &p, in_loc, out_loc, length);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error_clear_mux_table;
> out_loc += length;
> in_loc += length;
> }
> /* Relies on scan_timestamp being last */
> if (buffer->scan_timestamp) {
> - p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (p == NULL) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto error_clear_mux_table;
> - }
> ch = iio_find_channel_from_si(indio_dev,
> indio_dev->scan_index_timestamp);
> if (ch->scan_type.repeat > 1)
> @@ -1017,10 +1027,9 @@ static int iio_buffer_update_demux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8;
> out_loc = roundup(out_loc, length);
> in_loc = roundup(in_loc, length);
> - p->from = in_loc;
> - p->to = out_loc;
> - p->length = length;
> - list_add_tail(&p->l, &buffer->demux_list);
> + ret = iio_buffer_add_demux(buffer, &p, in_loc, out_loc, length);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error_clear_mux_table;
> out_loc += length;
> in_loc += length;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-20 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-17 15:59 [PATCH 1/4] iio: buffer: Fix demux table creation Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-07-17 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] iio: buffer: Use roundup() instead of ALIGN() Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-07-20 15:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-21 8:46 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-07-27 16:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-17 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] iio: buffer: Use roundup() instead of open-coding it Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-07-27 18:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-17 15:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] iio: buffer: Coalesce adjacent demux table entries Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-07-20 15:14 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2014-08-01 17:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-07-20 14:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] iio: buffer: Fix demux table creation Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53CBDCE1.6020403@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.