diff for duplicates of <53CC02C8.4010507@cogentembedded.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index a9b0f09..66fc90b 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ On 07/14/2014 11:58 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> compatible = "st,stih416-b2020", "st,stih416"; >>> + >>> + soc { ->>> + miphy365x_phy: miphy365x at fe382000 { ->>> + phy_port0: port at fe382000 { +>>> + miphy365x_phy: miphy365x@fe382000 { +>>> + phy_port0: port@fe382000 { >> I don't understand why are you creating the duplicate labels; >> doesn't 'dtc' complain about them? @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ On 07/14/2014 11:58 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > [...] ->>> + miphy365x_phy: miphy365x at fe382000 { +>>> + miphy365x_phy: miphy365x@fe382000 { >> The ePAPR standard [1] says: @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ On 07/14/2014 11:58 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> + #size-cells = <1>; >>> + ranges; >>> + ->>> + phy_port0: port at fe382000 { +>>> + phy_port0: port@fe382000 { >>> + #phy-cells = <1>; >> If these are PHY devices, they should be named "phy", not "port". diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index f890f13..f269897 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,10 +3,14 @@ "ref\020140711115406.GB2954@lee--X1\0" "ref\053C0819E.4000202@cogentembedded.com\0" "ref\020140714075835.GJ2954@lee--X1\0" - "From\0sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com (Sergei Shtylyov)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v3+1 5/5] ARM: DT: STi: STiH416: Add DT node for MiPHY365x\0" + "From\0Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v3+1 5/5] ARM: DT: STi: STiH416: Add DT node for MiPHY365x\0" "Date\0Sun, 20 Jul 2014 21:56:24 +0400\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>\0" + "Cc\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + kishon@ti.com + " kernel@stlinux.com\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Hello.\n" @@ -31,8 +35,8 @@ ">>> \tcompatible = \"st,stih416-b2020\", \"st,stih416\";\n" ">>> +\n" ">>> +\tsoc {\n" - ">>> +\t\tmiphy365x_phy: miphy365x at fe382000 {\n" - ">>> +\t\t\tphy_port0: port at fe382000 {\n" + ">>> +\t\tmiphy365x_phy: miphy365x@fe382000 {\n" + ">>> +\t\t\tphy_port0: port@fe382000 {\n" "\n" ">> I don't understand why are you creating the duplicate labels;\n" ">> doesn't 'dtc' complain about them?\n" @@ -68,7 +72,7 @@ "\n" "> [...]\n" "\n" - ">>> +\t\tmiphy365x_phy: miphy365x at fe382000 {\n" + ">>> +\t\tmiphy365x_phy: miphy365x@fe382000 {\n" "\n" ">> The ePAPR standard [1] says:\n" "\n" @@ -83,7 +87,7 @@ ">>> +\t\t\t#size-cells\t= <1>;\n" ">>> +\t\t\tranges;\n" ">>> +\n" - ">>> +\t\t\tphy_port0: port at fe382000 {\n" + ">>> +\t\t\tphy_port0: port@fe382000 {\n" ">>> +\t\t\t\t#phy-cells = <1>;\n" "\n" ">> If these are PHY devices, they should be named \"phy\", not \"port\".\n" @@ -94,4 +98,4 @@ "\n" WBR, Sergei -fc787eba2678a85b3bd6ffa5762daf42e7b8ad59cb177e6f42ead73d05958631 +13135e0f28c4e5d10b429cca648d67d044573bbba2215ca282007e0d35093855
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.