From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from nasmtp02.atmel.com ([204.2.163.16] helo=SJOEDG01.corp.atmel.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1X97AJ-0007lH-9y for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 06:33:39 +0000 Message-ID: <53CCB427.3090400@atmel.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:33:11 +0800 From: Josh Wu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: reduce the warning noise when the ECC is too weak References: <1404306992-28968-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20140714052259.GD29385@norris-Latitude-E6410> <53C8F011.7020507@atmel.com> <20140718165430.GY7537@ld-irv-0074> In-Reply-To: <20140718165430.GY7537@ld-irv-0074> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , Lior Amsalem , Tawfik Bayouk , Nadav Haklai , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Ezequiel Garcia , David Woodhouse List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, Brian On 7/19/2014 12:54 AM, Brian Norris wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:59:45PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote: >> On 7/14/2014 1:22 PM, Brian Norris wrote: >>> Pushed to linux-mtd.git, for 3.16 I think. Thanks! >> Excuse me that to ask a question which is not related with the code. >> >> I find this fix is not in l2-mtd.git but only in linux-mtd.git. So I >> wondering how the patch is merged in linux mainline and stable tree. >> >> Will the linux-mtd.git be merged in linux mainline and stable git >> tree before v3.16 release? So the l2-mtd.git can rebase on the >> merged tag. > I'm still working out what the *best* process is, but linux-mtd.git is > used as the official tree for pull requests to Linus, and I try hard to > make sure it doesn't need rebased. l2-mtd.git has historically served a > little more of a staging role, allowing rebases and is typically aimed > for the next merge window. > > In this case, I specifically applied the patch to linux-mtd.git since I > planned to (and did, already) send it to Linus for 3.16. yes. I see the pull request. > I will probably > merge it back into l2-mtd.git soon, to keep the 'next' tree (l2-mtd.git) > up-to-date. > > If you're looking to send patches for -next, please use l2-mtd.git (or > even linux-next.git). Thank you very much for the clear information. That's helpful. > > NB: linux-mtd.git and l2-mtd.git are both in linux-next. Perhaps > l2-mtd.git should be in MAINTAINERS? yes, I think so. The l2-mtd.git is used more often. It should be in MAINTAINERS as well. > > Regards, > Brian Best Regards, Josh Wu