From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 4/5] Samsung exynos_mct update for v3.17 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:47:39 +0200 Message-ID: <53CCD3AB.7040205@linaro.org> References: <53C9C164.9030404@samsung.com> <20140719220623.GF15676@quad.lixom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com ([74.125.82.170]:41650 "EHLO mail-we0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753036AbaGUIrl (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 04:47:41 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w62so7253345wes.29 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 01:47:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140719220623.GF15676@quad.lixom.net> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Olof Johansson , Kukjin Kim Cc: "arm@kernel.org" , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Doug Anderson , tglx@linutronix.de On 07/20/2014 12:06 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 09:52:52AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> Note that this is also based on 3.16-rc5 because of dependency with >> previous samsung fixes including exynos_mct already merged in >> mainline during -rc. >> >> The following changes since commit 1795cd9b3a91d4b5473c97f491d638924= 42212ab: >> >> Linux 3.16-rc5 (2014-07-13 14:04:33 -0700) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.gi= t >> tags/exynos-mct >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 1a631118c1d085fe162f3b6d44f710c72206e= f2d: >> >> clocksource: exynos_mct: Only use 32-bits where possible >> (2014-07-19 03:07:52 +0900) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> exynos_mct update for v3.17 >> - only use 32-bit access for performance benefits on exynos >> 32-bit system and this means ARCH timer should be supported >> on exynos 64-bit system instead of current MCT. >> - use readl_relaxed/writel_relaxed to consistently use the >> proper functions in exynos_mct. > > There's no reason for these to go through arm-soc, is there? They sho= uld > go through the clocksource tree (Daniel Lezcano / Thomas Gleixner). T= hey > also lack acks from them if they for some reason need to go through a= rm-soc. Yes, that's right. Furthermore I have been discussing with Doug about=20 these patches before. Kukjin, is there any dependency on these patches ? --=20 Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software fo= r ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:47:39 +0200 Subject: [GIT PULL 4/5] Samsung exynos_mct update for v3.17 In-Reply-To: <20140719220623.GF15676@quad.lixom.net> References: <53C9C164.9030404@samsung.com> <20140719220623.GF15676@quad.lixom.net> Message-ID: <53CCD3AB.7040205@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/20/2014 12:06 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 09:52:52AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> Note that this is also based on 3.16-rc5 because of dependency with >> previous samsung fixes including exynos_mct already merged in >> mainline during -rc. >> >> The following changes since commit 1795cd9b3a91d4b5473c97f491d63892442212ab: >> >> Linux 3.16-rc5 (2014-07-13 14:04:33 -0700) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git >> tags/exynos-mct >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 1a631118c1d085fe162f3b6d44f710c72206ef2d: >> >> clocksource: exynos_mct: Only use 32-bits where possible >> (2014-07-19 03:07:52 +0900) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> exynos_mct update for v3.17 >> - only use 32-bit access for performance benefits on exynos >> 32-bit system and this means ARCH timer should be supported >> on exynos 64-bit system instead of current MCT. >> - use readl_relaxed/writel_relaxed to consistently use the >> proper functions in exynos_mct. > > There's no reason for these to go through arm-soc, is there? They should > go through the clocksource tree (Daniel Lezcano / Thomas Gleixner). They > also lack acks from them if they for some reason need to go through arm-soc. Yes, that's right. Furthermore I have been discussing with Doug about these patches before. Kukjin, is there any dependency on these patches ? -- Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog