From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] virtio-rng: Add human-readable error message for negative max-bytes parameter
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:44:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53CD355A.1000804@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8761irkv8y.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
On 07/21/2014 03:48 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> It certainly could check whether the value fits into uint64_t.
>
> A quick peek at how string-input-visitor.c uses strtoll() makes me
> cringe.
>
> [...]
What I meant by that was to say that by the time a value was returned to
visit_type_uint64, the value has already been possibly converted
implicitly from a negative value, and we can't tell at this level if
that happened without re-inspecting the string we were passed. At that
point, why not just fix the string parsing mechanics one more layer down
in parse_type_int() -- or by creating another routine primitive; i.e
parse_type_uint.
As Eric Blake noted elsewhere in the thread, it would be nice to have
the ability to have three behaviors at the lowest level -- signed,
unsigned with wraparound, and unsigned strict. The biggest question in
my mind is how to add the property flag to allow authors to opt-in to
the unsigned with wraparound option, where the unsigned strict option
makes the most sense to me as a default.
For now I will just fix the error message. We can draft ideas for how to
fix the semantic issues in parsing later.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-21 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-17 20:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] virtio-rng: Add human-readable error message for negative max-bytes parameter John Snow
2014-07-18 6:27 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-07-18 7:46 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-18 11:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-07-18 11:27 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-18 11:54 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-07-18 12:14 ` Amit Shah
2014-07-18 13:16 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-07-18 16:22 ` John Snow
2014-07-21 7:38 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-07-18 21:14 ` John Snow
2014-07-18 21:53 ` Eric Blake
2014-07-21 7:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-07-21 15:44 ` John Snow [this message]
2014-07-21 17:33 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-07-21 17:53 ` John Snow
2014-07-21 19:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-07-21 20:13 ` John Snow
2014-07-21 20:31 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53CD355A.1000804@redhat.com \
--to=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.