From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id D28DBE00524; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:54:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.192.173 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com (mail-pd0-f173.google.com [209.85.192.173]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A72E00342 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:54:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id w10so11449606pde.18 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:54:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IOkzcPokIiX5HKIic6WhDgLwqcViW4h3rTZWkgS2OX8=; b=jWFUTHGXQFKZajjkUXD7dy4Q/KFSvLmyOnoz1cx1QmpsU9neU6V45CkSE+KN30unBi yB2Q2v4FFN4gOgSf7ZBbgt+5dw5dYfJV0XZOVyw5FXgROQQ2KlE4fjK/vc7kHnttWQfo o/VBVkUwfUJNvbv1eS404BO9WKQE+a0DZoElJB9xn4dlh4Oqsa3n5rOitCCpevG5gmnt urYdIQM54t0KcjiZFgaY8Ggu2EExvCVdNfkYjyYviRZVhHYcmujSL7xsSWUMZO8MtQQ4 2CMf+5jyG5nRqVY5Q7Q0wGX8zVEogdx1atZKF89LjyqVrNzwWG8V4XsZ4ZH1NH90WEmB HYCw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmmu8iRz9yRhzbEs0kfNxnr4KEL894vPIlKTS3e9xRc68XiQKO9n0foNWEsnGAeueN8zO9o X-Received: by 10.66.66.229 with SMTP id i5mr7662103pat.47.1406044455675; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:54:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.1.20] (c-98-239-95-55.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [98.239.95.55]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cb8sm2746498pad.8.2014.07.22.08.54.14 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:54:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53CE8923.6030307@mvista.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:54:11 -0700 From: akuster User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexandru Vaduva , Joe MacDonald References: <6B17198E316BD04DBB6F6DD263019AE125573C4A@SESTOEX04.enea.se> <2D55BFC2C836774DB0F2FE17BECC006C28993A30@SESTOEX04.enea.se> In-Reply-To: Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:54:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alexandru, Regarding a few packages in category C&D. I have latest samhain building as well as grsecurity (pax patches=20 applied against 3.14.12) in a branch in my meta-security tree. I have a = bit more testing to do before I was going to post them. grsecurity and samhain aren't CGL specific and they maybe belong in a=20 more generalize layer? just a thought. regards, Armin On 07/22/2014 03:52 AM, Alexandru Vaduva wrote: > Hello Joe, > > Here at Enea we are preparing the steps needed for publishing the layer= on the open embedded meta layers initiative: http://layers.openembedded.= org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/ > For this we started working at a web page that should contain all the r= elevant information regarding meta-cgl. It will be available in a couple = of weeks. Until then the layer will be available internally and the patch= es should > be submitted as the README states: on the enealinux@lists.enea.com mail= ing list. We will try to make the switch to Open Embedded mailing list as= quick as possible. > > Regarding the other B, C and D packages that we will try to add into t= he meta-cgl layer, I will post this information below, but keep in mind t= hat this information will also be available on the web page. > Category B packages: > - ifenslave > - evlog > - crash > - mipv6-daemon-umip > - openl2tp > Category C&D packages: > - drbd > - grsecurity > - logcheck > - makedumpfile > - numactl > - ocfs2-tools > - pam_passwdqc > - samhain > - ltt-usertrace > - ftrace > The above lists correspond with only the P1 requirements that we try to= fulfill for the moment. If there are any questions and/or suggestions re= garding this CGL initialtive please address them to me and I will try to = offer a response in the > shortest time possible. > > > Thanks, > Alex > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe MacDonald [mailto:joe@deserted.net] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 10:58 PM > To: Alexandru Vaduva > Cc: Jeff Osier-Mixon; yocto@yoctoproject.org > Subject: Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal > > Hey Alex, > > I've been away from this for a bit but now I'm getting time to look at = it again and I was wondering if you had any deeper level of detail you co= uld share about the work going on in meta-cgl. Obviously since this is a= new registration and one that will look rather different from all of the= other CGL registrations currently, those of us in the CGL workgroup were= quite interested to see this happen. Personally I'm also interested in = this since it's the kind of thing I've been doing for a long time now and= if I can, I'd like to help out. In particular, if you've got a list of,= say, the category B+ items, that might be something I can do that will b= e independent of your work on the more active cat-A stuff. OTOH, cat-A i= s easy to work on since those are the items I saw when I was working with= meta-cgl a month or so back. I know you guys are focused on your part o= f it, but if you had sort of a "here's how to help us" guide, that'd be a= wesome. > > Also, I probably missed it, but is the intent to use either the yocto l= ist or the oe list for all meta-cgl discussions, or do you have a dedicat= ed list we can sign up for? I see you have guidance for sending submissi= ons to meta-cgl, but is that a list that's open to the community, or is i= t an internal alias / distribution list for Enea? > > Thanks, > -J. > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alexandru Vaduva wrote: >> Hello Jeff, >> >> The errors are package related. >> Meta-cgl can be seen as a non BSP specific layer (it can be viewed as = the LSB from poky). >> I already started fixing a number, of the already existing errors and = the patches will be added upstream after proper testing. >> I will continue the bug fixing and package integration (into the >> core-image-cgl image) process and after that is finished I will contin= ue with the Category B packages. >> >> I will also try to keep you guys informed about the latest updates, >> mainly on the YPTM, but for those who cannot wait that much, there is >> the Git repository with which they can interact: >> http://git.enea.com/git/?p=3Dlinux/meta-cgl.git;a=3Dsummary >> >> >> Have a good day, >> Alex >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: jefro.net@gmail.com [mailto:jefro.net@gmail.com] On Behalf Of >> Jeff Osier-Mixon >> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 9:22 PM >> To: Alexandru Vaduva >> Subject: Re: [OE-core] Carrier Grade layer proposal >> >> Thanks, Alex. >> >> Others on the mailing lists, if you have any comments on the contents = of this new layer, please mention them on this thread. >> >> Re compilation errors, were they specific to a BSP or were they genera= l errors in the packages? >> >> thanks >> >> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Alexandru Vaduva wrote: >>> Hello Jeff, >>> >>> >>> >>> The available layer is a work in progress. >>> >>> For the moment we have done an internal mapping of the packages >>> needed inside meta-cgl layer. The mapping is done as following: >>> A. Requirement that map against package/packages with recipes that >>> already exists in Yocto >>> A1. Requirement that map against package/packages with recipes >>> already existing in meta-enea >>> A2. Requirement that map against package/packages with recipes tha= t >>> exists in Yocto (but not in meta-enea) B. Requirement that map >>> against package/packages without any recipe C. Requirement does not >>> directly map against package/packages and needs some investigation. >>> D. Requirement that no solution have been found after a more detailed= >>> investigation. >>> >>> >>> >>> When the release was made available on the public repository, the >>> packages from the A1 and A2 were integrated, a bunch of them with com= pilation errors: >>> >>> - lksctp-tools >>> >>> - openais >>> >>> - pacemaker >>> >>> - openhpi >>> >>> - open-iscsi-user >>> >>> - open-iscsi-kernel >>> >>> - libcap-ng >>> >>> - cluster-glue >>> >>> - cluster-resource-agents >>> >>> The activity on the meta-cgl was resumed today and those build and >>> integration errors will be dealt next. >>> >>> >>> >>> On the longer run we will try to create recipes and/or fulfill all >>> the other requirements from the class B, C, and D. >>> >>> Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have further questions. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Alex >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Jon Aldama >>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 1:07 PM >>> To: Alexandru Vaduva; Cosmin Moldoveanu; Jenny Andersson; David >>> Nystr=C3=B6m >>> Cc: Daniel Bornaz; Adrian Dudau >>> Subject: RE: Carrier Grade layer proposal >>> >>> >>> >>> Roger that! Thanks Alexandru! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Alexandru Vaduva >>> Sent: den 27 juni 2014 11:43 >>> To: Jon Aldama; Cosmin Moldoveanu; Jenny Andersson; David Nystr=C3=B6= m >>> Cc: Daniel Bornaz; Adrian Dudau >>> Subject: RE: Carrier Grade layer proposal >>> >>> >>> >>> Hello Jon, >>> >>> >>> >>> We will first have an internal meeting on Monday and after that I >>> will offer an answer to Jeff. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Alex >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Jon Aldama >>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 12:32 PM >>> To: Cosmin Moldoveanu; Jenny Andersson; David Nystr=C3=B6m >>> Cc: Alexandru Vaduva; Daniel Bornaz; Adrian Dudau >>> Subject: RE: Carrier Grade layer proposal >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you Cosmin, >>> >>> >>> >>> Alexandru, could you please respond Jeff at the mailing list? (see >>> down >>> below) >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Jon >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Cosmin Moldoveanu >>> Sent: den 27 juni 2014 10:59 >>> To: Jenny Andersson; Jon Aldama; David Nystr=C3=B6m >>> Cc: Alexandru Vaduva; Daniel Bornaz; Adrian Dudau >>> Subject: RE: Carrier Grade layer proposal >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> Alexandru Vaduva will be main responsible for interfacing with >>> community on meta-cgl topic. He will also attend Yocto Technical >>> Meetings whenever necessary from now on. >>> >>> >>> >>> BR, >>> >>> /Cosmin >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Jenny Andersson >>> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:32 AM >>> To: Jon Aldama; David Nystr=C3=B6m; Cosmin Moldoveanu >>> Cc: Valentin Cobelea >>> Subject: RE: Carrier Grade layer proposal >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Cosmin, >>> >>> >>> >>> How took over after Valentin left Enea? Could someone in your team re= spond. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jenny >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Jon Aldama >>> Sent: den 27 juni 2014 09:28 >>> To: David Nystr=C3=B6m; Jenny Andersson >>> Cc: Valentin Cobelea >>> Subject: FW: Carrier Grade layer proposal >>> >>> >>> >>> David, Jenny, >>> >>> >>> >>> Will any of you answer this? >>> >>> >>> >>> BTW, have you managed to file the Yocto compatibility application? >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Jon >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Osier-mixon, Jeffrey [mailto:jeffrey.osier-mixon@intel.com] >>> Sent: den 26 juni 2014 20:36 >>> To: David Nystr=C3=B6m; davide.ricci@windriver.com; challinan@gmail.c= om; >>> teodor.bobornilo@windriver.com; Valentin Cobelea; >>> chase.maupin@ti.com; Jon Aldama; philip.balister@gmail.com; >>> kevin_mccombe@mentor.com; akuster@mvista.com; >>> jason.wessel@windriver.com; richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org; >>> hui.geng@huawei.com; john_cherry@mentor.com; >>> jeffrey.osier-mixon@intel.com >>> Cc: Philip Balister >>> Subject: YP: Carrier Grade layer proposal >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi all - this is a simple followup to our meeting at ELC regarding a >>> meta-cgl layer, proposed by Enea. >>> >>> >>> >>> The plan was to create a list of recipes to be included, and to start= >>> a discussion on the mailing list.There is a thread on the list from >>> back in April, but I don't see anything more recent than that. Has >>> there been any progress? >>> >>> >>> >>> thanks >>> >>> >>> -- >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openembedded-core mailing list >>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >>> >> >> >> -- >> Jeff Osier-Mixon @Intel >> Yocto Project Community Manager http://yoctoproject.org >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > -- > Joe MacDonald > :wq