From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 4/5] Samsung exynos_mct update for v3.17 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:33:16 +0900 Message-ID: <53CEF4BC.1050105@samsung.com> References: <53C9C164.9030404@samsung.com> <20140719220623.GF15676@quad.lixom.net> <53CCD3AB.7040205@linaro.org> <01b601cfa59c$12c2c7f0$384857d0$@samsung.com> <53CEA020.309@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f182.google.com ([209.85.192.182]:41050 "EHLO mail-pd0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932115AbaGVXd1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:33:27 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fp1so432418pdb.41 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:33:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53CEA020.309@linaro.org> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Kukjin Kim , 'Olof Johansson' , arm@kernel.org, 'Arnd Bergmann' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, 'Doug Anderson' , tglx@linutronix.de On 07/23/14 02:32, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 07/22/2014 12:59 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> >>> On 07/20/2014 12:06 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: >>>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 09:52:52AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>>>> Note that this is also based on 3.16-rc5 because of dependency with >>>>> previous samsung fixes including exynos_mct already merged in >>>>> mainline during -rc. >>>>> >>>>> The following changes since commit >>>>> 1795cd9b3a91d4b5473c97f491d63892442212ab: >>>>> >>>>> Linux 3.16-rc5 (2014-07-13 14:04:33 -0700) >>>>> >>>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git >>>>> tags/exynos-mct >>>>> >>>>> for you to fetch changes up to >>>>> 1a631118c1d085fe162f3b6d44f710c72206ef2d: >>>>> >>>>> clocksource: exynos_mct: Only use 32-bits where possible >>>>> (2014-07-19 03:07:52 +0900) >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> exynos_mct update for v3.17 >>>>> - only use 32-bit access for performance benefits on exynos >>>>> 32-bit system and this means ARCH timer should be supported >>>>> on exynos 64-bit system instead of current MCT. >>>>> - use readl_relaxed/writel_relaxed to consistently use the >>>>> proper functions in exynos_mct. >>>> >>>> There's no reason for these to go through arm-soc, is there? They >>>> should >>>> go through the clocksource tree (Daniel Lezcano / Thomas Gleixner). >>>> They >>>> also lack acks from them if they for some reason need to go through >>>> arm-soc. >>> >> Olof, you're right. The branch has no dependency with arm-soc so I >> agreed. >> >>> Yes, that's right. Furthermore I have been discussing with Doug about >>> these patches before. >>> >>> Kukjin, is there any dependency on these patches ? >>> >> Yeah, Daniel, it should be handled in the clocksource tree so how >> should I do >> for it? > > I can pull your branch v3.17-next/mct-exynos and you drop the merge from > this branch in your master ? > Yes please and I did drop the merge in my -next just now. Thanks, Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:33:16 +0900 Subject: [GIT PULL 4/5] Samsung exynos_mct update for v3.17 In-Reply-To: <53CEA020.309@linaro.org> References: <53C9C164.9030404@samsung.com> <20140719220623.GF15676@quad.lixom.net> <53CCD3AB.7040205@linaro.org> <01b601cfa59c$12c2c7f0$384857d0$@samsung.com> <53CEA020.309@linaro.org> Message-ID: <53CEF4BC.1050105@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/23/14 02:32, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 07/22/2014 12:59 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> >>> On 07/20/2014 12:06 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: >>>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 09:52:52AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>>>> Note that this is also based on 3.16-rc5 because of dependency with >>>>> previous samsung fixes including exynos_mct already merged in >>>>> mainline during -rc. >>>>> >>>>> The following changes since commit >>>>> 1795cd9b3a91d4b5473c97f491d63892442212ab: >>>>> >>>>> Linux 3.16-rc5 (2014-07-13 14:04:33 -0700) >>>>> >>>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git >>>>> tags/exynos-mct >>>>> >>>>> for you to fetch changes up to >>>>> 1a631118c1d085fe162f3b6d44f710c72206ef2d: >>>>> >>>>> clocksource: exynos_mct: Only use 32-bits where possible >>>>> (2014-07-19 03:07:52 +0900) >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> exynos_mct update for v3.17 >>>>> - only use 32-bit access for performance benefits on exynos >>>>> 32-bit system and this means ARCH timer should be supported >>>>> on exynos 64-bit system instead of current MCT. >>>>> - use readl_relaxed/writel_relaxed to consistently use the >>>>> proper functions in exynos_mct. >>>> >>>> There's no reason for these to go through arm-soc, is there? They >>>> should >>>> go through the clocksource tree (Daniel Lezcano / Thomas Gleixner). >>>> They >>>> also lack acks from them if they for some reason need to go through >>>> arm-soc. >>> >> Olof, you're right. The branch has no dependency with arm-soc so I >> agreed. >> >>> Yes, that's right. Furthermore I have been discussing with Doug about >>> these patches before. >>> >>> Kukjin, is there any dependency on these patches ? >>> >> Yeah, Daniel, it should be handled in the clocksource tree so how >> should I do >> for it? > > I can pull your branch v3.17-next/mct-exynos and you drop the merge from > this branch in your master ? > Yes please and I did drop the merge in my -next just now. Thanks, Kukjin