From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 4/5] Samsung exynos_mct update for v3.17 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:03:23 +0200 Message-ID: <53CF6C4B.8010608@linaro.org> References: <53C9C164.9030404@samsung.com> <20140719220623.GF15676@quad.lixom.net> <53CCD3AB.7040205@linaro.org> <01b601cfa59c$12c2c7f0$384857d0$@samsung.com> <53CEA020.309@linaro.org> <53CEF4BC.1050105@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:47723 "EHLO mail-wi0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753919AbaGWID1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2014 04:03:27 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id bs8so1715464wib.2 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 01:03:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53CEF4BC.1050105@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: 'Olof Johansson' , arm@kernel.org, 'Arnd Bergmann' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, 'Doug Anderson' , tglx@linutronix.de On 07/23/2014 01:33 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 07/23/14 02:32, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 07/22/2014 12:59 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>> Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>>> >>>> On 07/20/2014 12:06 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: >>>>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 09:52:52AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>>>>> Note that this is also based on 3.16-rc5 because of dependency w= ith >>>>>> previous samsung fixes including exynos_mct already merged in >>>>>> mainline during -rc. >>>>>> >>>>>> The following changes since commit >>>>>> 1795cd9b3a91d4b5473c97f491d63892442212ab: >>>>>> >>>>>> Linux 3.16-rc5 (2014-07-13 14:04:33 -0700) >>>>>> >>>>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsun= g.git >>>>>> tags/exynos-mct >>>>>> >>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to >>>>>> 1a631118c1d085fe162f3b6d44f710c72206ef2d: >>>>>> >>>>>> clocksource: exynos_mct: Only use 32-bits where possible >>>>>> (2014-07-19 03:07:52 +0900) >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> exynos_mct update for v3.17 >>>>>> - only use 32-bit access for performance benefits on exynos >>>>>> 32-bit system and this means ARCH timer should be supported >>>>>> on exynos 64-bit system instead of current MCT. >>>>>> - use readl_relaxed/writel_relaxed to consistently use the >>>>>> proper functions in exynos_mct. >>>>> >>>>> There's no reason for these to go through arm-soc, is there? They >>>>> should >>>>> go through the clocksource tree (Daniel Lezcano / Thomas Gleixner= ). >>>>> They >>>>> also lack acks from them if they for some reason need to go throu= gh >>>>> arm-soc. >>>> >>> Olof, you're right. The branch has no dependency with arm-soc so I >>> agreed. >>> >>>> Yes, that's right. Furthermore I have been discussing with Doug ab= out >>>> these patches before. >>>> >>>> Kukjin, is there any dependency on these patches ? >>>> >>> Yeah, Daniel, it should be handled in the clocksource tree so how >>> should I do >>> for it? >> >> I can pull your branch v3.17-next/mct-exynos and you drop the merge = from >> this branch in your master ? >> > Yes please and I did drop the merge in my -next just now. Ok, thanks. The patches are applied in my branch for 3.17. -- Daniel --=20 Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software fo= r ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:03:23 +0200 Subject: [GIT PULL 4/5] Samsung exynos_mct update for v3.17 In-Reply-To: <53CEF4BC.1050105@samsung.com> References: <53C9C164.9030404@samsung.com> <20140719220623.GF15676@quad.lixom.net> <53CCD3AB.7040205@linaro.org> <01b601cfa59c$12c2c7f0$384857d0$@samsung.com> <53CEA020.309@linaro.org> <53CEF4BC.1050105@samsung.com> Message-ID: <53CF6C4B.8010608@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/23/2014 01:33 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 07/23/14 02:32, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 07/22/2014 12:59 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>> Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>>> >>>> On 07/20/2014 12:06 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: >>>>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 09:52:52AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>>>>> Note that this is also based on 3.16-rc5 because of dependency with >>>>>> previous samsung fixes including exynos_mct already merged in >>>>>> mainline during -rc. >>>>>> >>>>>> The following changes since commit >>>>>> 1795cd9b3a91d4b5473c97f491d63892442212ab: >>>>>> >>>>>> Linux 3.16-rc5 (2014-07-13 14:04:33 -0700) >>>>>> >>>>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git >>>>>> tags/exynos-mct >>>>>> >>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to >>>>>> 1a631118c1d085fe162f3b6d44f710c72206ef2d: >>>>>> >>>>>> clocksource: exynos_mct: Only use 32-bits where possible >>>>>> (2014-07-19 03:07:52 +0900) >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> exynos_mct update for v3.17 >>>>>> - only use 32-bit access for performance benefits on exynos >>>>>> 32-bit system and this means ARCH timer should be supported >>>>>> on exynos 64-bit system instead of current MCT. >>>>>> - use readl_relaxed/writel_relaxed to consistently use the >>>>>> proper functions in exynos_mct. >>>>> >>>>> There's no reason for these to go through arm-soc, is there? They >>>>> should >>>>> go through the clocksource tree (Daniel Lezcano / Thomas Gleixner). >>>>> They >>>>> also lack acks from them if they for some reason need to go through >>>>> arm-soc. >>>> >>> Olof, you're right. The branch has no dependency with arm-soc so I >>> agreed. >>> >>>> Yes, that's right. Furthermore I have been discussing with Doug about >>>> these patches before. >>>> >>>> Kukjin, is there any dependency on these patches ? >>>> >>> Yeah, Daniel, it should be handled in the clocksource tree so how >>> should I do >>> for it? >> >> I can pull your branch v3.17-next/mct-exynos and you drop the merge from >> this branch in your master ? >> > Yes please and I did drop the merge in my -next just now. Ok, thanks. The patches are applied in my branch for 3.17. -- Daniel -- Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog